At 09:04 PM 5/11/98 -0400, you wrote:
>At 07:37 PM 5/11/98 +00-06, you wrote:
>>> Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 15:00:49 -0500
>>> From: James Henry <James_Henry@willbros.com>
>>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>> Subject: DML: Re: Car & Driver Dak; what's wrong with this picture?
>>> Reply-to: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>
>>> What have you done to get your DAK to run 10's! Have your dropped a
426 Hemi in it? IS it still street legal?
>>
>>
>>On this note, MOPAR is working on a swap kit for the Hemi into a
>>Dakota.
>>
> Where did you hear this? It sounds like a wonderful waste of money!
Seriously, I think it has enough frame strength to pull it off.
Let us know if you hear anything else.
Tony
> Are they really? That'd be cool. :-)
>
> But, does MP still want an arm and a leg for their HEMI engines? I'd
>be really neat to have a hemi, but for the price, I wonder if a non-hemi
>crate engine might be a better $/performance buy.
>
> -Jon-
>
> .--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu -- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---.
> | DoD# 1038, EAA# 518210, NMA# 117376, USUA# A46209, KotWitDoDFAQ, RP-SEL |
> | '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT Club Cab, '96 Kolb FireFly 447 (#FF019) |
> `-------------------------------------------------------------------------'
> I do not speak for the SUNY College at Fredonia; any opinions are my own.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:47 EDT