This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01BD8C21.B09053E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am not trying to sure up any great debate but I noticed when I use 93 =
oct. gas it get better millage than 87. I just ran a tank of 87 and I =
only got 9.5-10mpg which is horrible. When I run 93 i get 12.5 all the =
time. Does anyone else see I difference in mpg with different grade of =
gas. I have done more then one tank of 87 and the results are always =
the same and I dont think it was a bad tank because my truck doesnt =
perform any different on either grade of gas. Pretty darn werid if you =
ask me.
Tony Sarro
tonyms@acadiacom.net=20
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01BD8C21.B09053E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I am not trying to sure up any great =
debate but=20
I noticed when I use 93 oct. gas it get better millage than 87. I =
just ran=20
a tank of 87 and I only got 9.5-10mpg which is horrible. When I =
run 93 i=20
get 12.5 all the time. Does anyone else see I difference in mpg =
with=20
different grade of gas. I have done more then one tank of 87 and =
the=20
results are always the same and I dont think it was a bad tank because =
my truck=20
doesnt perform any different on either grade of gas. Pretty darn =
werid if=20
you ask me.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Tony Sarro</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"mailto:tonyms@acadiacom.net">tonyms@acadiacom.net</A>=20
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01BD8C21.B09053E0--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:52 EDT