snip
>>>> I'd be curious what the torque curve is on the Turbo V6
is<<<<
probably looks something like a "swoosh" on a pair of Nike's =)
-mike d!
88, V6, LE, 3.55, SlushBox
miggitymike@juno.com >or< mpsykes@erols.com
"Call me Special, stick-man stencil, thin like a pencil!"
- 2 Skinnee J's
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998 14:03:37 -0400 Robert Tufts <rbt@frontiernet.net>
writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>GMC Syclone Specs: Power to weight- 12.5 lb/HP
>- 4.3L V6 Turbo Charged 280HP
>- AWD
>- 3500lbs
>- 0-60MPH 5sec
>
>Dodge Dakota R/T Regular Cab: Power to weight- 14 lb/HP
>- 5.9L V8 250HP
>- Rear wheel drive
>- 3508lbs
>- 0-60MPH 6.9sec
>
>So guys it looks like the only thing the Dakota lacks is traction.
>What can
>we do to improve this substantially? What is everyone's thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>
>
>Sounds like alot to make up to me. The 8lbs weight is nothing, but the
>AWD and
>30hp deficit is alot. I'd be curious what the torque curve is on the
>Turbo V6
>is. I know the Buick GNX's did well with it. Sounds like the full time
>4X4
>from the Durango with Vortec(or something) would be a minimum.
>
>-Bob T. '98 Sport+ CC 4X4 V8 5sp 4WABS 3.55 Towing
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:56 EDT