Well , unless someone can give me ruough estimate of what hte FABM can give
me in numbers , I think I'll use that Money and try the Airaid .
If ya wanna take it to that extreme , then why should I try an K&N of the
FABM ? Up to this point I have heard nothing more than what it "feels" like
by everyone else .
I guess I'll just take my chances .
PEACE
At 02:44 PM 6/17/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>>> "W. Jack Hilton III" <hemi@mindspring.com> 06/17/98 02:18pm >>>
>
>Well , you gotta have faith at some point . If ya wanna be that way , then
>how are we "sure" that our daks put out at least 230HP (5.2) or 250HP
>(5.9) ?
>
>if they can put it on paper , they are risking being sued for fraud if it's
>untrue , so I would bet that it's pretty damn close to whatever they claim
>, as long as they will put it on paper .
>
>
>At 01:54 PM 6/17/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>Well, the only way to be sure is to put your Dak on a dyno (or use a
>G-Tech). Some guys on the list have done this, and I can tell you with
>absolute certainty that they didn't get the numbers that CC publishes. I
>would love to say that my Dak (5.2L) had 230HP stock, but that doesn't
>make it true.
>
>I am not telling you that they didn't get 13HP gain on the dyno (you can
>make a dyno tell you just about anything), but I would be very surprised if
>you get that much. Hey, prove me wrong, I would love nothing more than
>to get 13HP from a new intake setup. A G-Tech is only $140 - about the
>same as a before & after session on the dyno.
>
>Steve
>
>
Jack Hilton
'98 CC R/T "Black Death"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:57 EDT