Re: K&N counterpoint Comments

From: Jon Steiger (stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 21 1998 - 17:58:52 EDT

Next message: Dkota4by4@aol.com: "Re: ALL MOPAR SHOW Attn:Russ"
Previous message: (no email): "(no subject)"
In reply to: HKUSP40578@aol.com: "Re: K&N counterpoint Comments"
Next in thread: Amosil@aol.com: "Re: K&N counterpoint Comments"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 21 Jul 1998 HKUSP40578@aol.com wrote:

> WHY AREN'T ANY OF YOU GUYS USING AMSOIL AIRR FILTERS??????
> DONT HAVE TO CLEAN EM FOR 25,000 MILES....AND EVEN AT THAT MILEAGE THEY FLOW
> BETTER THAN K&N FILTERS!!!!!
>

K&N's recommended cleaning interval is 50,000 miles. A dirty
K&N (within reason) will also flow better than a clean K&N.

-Jon-

  .--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ------------------------------------.
  | Affiliations: DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA. RP-SEL |
  | '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT CC (14.98@90.18), '96 Kolb FireFly 447 |
  `----------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'

Next message: Dkota4by4@aol.com: "Re: ALL MOPAR SHOW Attn:Russ"
Previous message: (no email): "(no subject)"
In reply to: HKUSP40578@aol.com: "Re: K&N counterpoint Comments"
Next in thread: Amosil@aol.com: "Re: K&N counterpoint Comments"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:08 EDT