Re: 99 Dakota R/T

From: Klaus Wilkens (klaus@buffnet.net)
Date: Thu Jul 23 1998 - 17:03:27 EDT


Let us not forget the beloved insurance conpanies and their contribution to the
demise of the muscle car.

Klaus

Mike Crumley wrote:

> At 12:52 AM 7/23/98 , you wrote:
>
> >If it weren't for the
> >government pressure, I'd bet that manufacturers would be doing the
> >same thing they did in the 50's and 60's; making their engines
> >bigger and more powerful.
>
> Are we talking about the same 50's and 60's when gas prices were only 1/4th
> of what they are now and nobody cared what kind of sucky gas mileage they
> got? Government regulations played some part to be sure, but the energy
> crisis and skyrocketing gas prices were the major reasons consumers started
> demanding smaller, more efficient motors.
>
> FWIW, Jon, I understand the frustrations you express and I don't disagree
> with you about that. I just think that you're trying to place too much of
> the blame on the EPA and gov't regs when there are other factors that play
> as much if not more of a role.
>
> Mike (112 in the shade today) Crumley
>
> --
> Mike Crumley mcrumley@airmail.net
> 97 Dakota Regular Cab Short Bed
> 3.9L V6 3.55 Auto Rhino Liner
> Bug Shield Mud Flaps DDBC



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:09 EDT