Re: Jack Hilton actually uses 87 octane

From: Richard A Pyburn (rap777@juno.com)
Date: Thu Sep 10 1998 - 13:57:12 EDT


>>
>>
>
>
>
>I know , I know , but it is a well-known fact that a higher octane
>rating
>than what is required is totally pointless .
>
>The only gain other than that would maybe be that it may be possibly
>refined a little better .

Jack, surely you pick could pick up a few tenths with a lighter wallet
;^}
>
>I have no knocks and no problems on 87 , which *is* what the manual
>states
>as required fuel .
>
>And yes , I must be a cheap-skate , because 87 is going for about $.79
>here
>and premium is at about $.99 .
>
>
>W . Jack Hilton III
>
>HEMI@charter.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:48 EDT