On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 15:40:09 -0700 "Mok, Alan (SPB Brentwood)"
<AMok@spbank.com> writes:
>How come your address is "fordf-series" then?
>
>Seriously now, I've driven both. My friend's '97 Ram CC (318 sport
>package 3.5 axle). It feels a lot bigger than a Dak. The back seat is
>roomy almost sedan like. You're higher up and the handling is
>"looser".
>I think it really depends on how much you need to haul around. I wish
>I
>can drive a RAM SS/T so I can directly compare it with my R/T.
>
>Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>'98 Dakota R/T (Headers, FABM & waiting for Shift kit)
>'89 Mustang GT (347, Griggs, S-trim...)
>Ducati 916 (someday)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe t [mailto:fordf-series@juno.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 2:19 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Ram vs. Dakota
>
> I am a Dodge and Chevrolet fanatic. But since I have
>a
>family member who
> worked for Chrysler, I will probably get a Dodge. I
>am
>wondering if
> anyone here has a Ram and a Dakota. I am wondering
>witch one is nicer.
> Easy to drive, good gas milage, and is more
>comfotable.
>Thank You.
>
> Joe
> FordF-Series@juno.com
>
>
>
Which one did you think would be better for a 17 year old to buy. Is
there that much of a price difference between the Ram and Dakota. Is
there also much of a gas milage difference between a Dakota CC with the
5.2 auto, and the Ram with the 5.2-5.9 auto.
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:50 EDT