RE: M1 intake was: NiTrOus

• Next message: R.Mock: "Re: Ram vs. Dakota"
• Previous message: Klaus Wilkens: "Re: What does R/T stand for anyway?"
• Maybe in reply to: GSWillhite: "M1 intake was: NiTrOus"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

That's what I thought too....

Tate

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Hilton III [SMTP:HEMI@charter.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 5:57 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: M1 intake was: NiTrOus

>Yeah for the money spent ($260) to horsepower ratio its probably
>a worthwhile investment. hopefully as good as a high perf.
>exhaust upgrade. Wonder what the torque loss would be compared
>to the stock beer barrel (if any)?
>
>
>GS
>
>

Didn't we determine a few months back that this won't work on the 97+ Daks ?

W . Jack Hilton III

HEMI@charter.net

• Next message: R.Mock: "Re: Ram vs. Dakota"
• Previous message: Klaus Wilkens: "Re: What does R/T stand for anyway?"
• Maybe in reply to: GSWillhite: "M1 intake was: NiTrOus"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:50 EDT