RE: Re: 5.2 Sport vs R/T

From: Bridges, Bruce (bbridges@alarismed.com)
Date: Fri Sep 25 1998 - 10:04:31 EDT

Next message: Bridges, Bruce: "RE: Respect the big 3"
Previous message: Kevin Bonanno: "3.9 noise"
Maybe reply: Mok, Alan: "RE: Re: 5.2 Sport vs R/T"
Maybe reply: Bridges, Bruce: "RE: Re: 5.2 Sport vs R/T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yes, I agree.
I have been taken by a stock 95 318 5sp in my stock R/T. Thats one reason
its not stock anymore...
BKB

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Trottmann [mailto:rotrottmann@davidson.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 1998 9:27 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 5.2 Sport vs R/T

I seriously doubt he is. I think that a 95 reg. cab 5.2 stock will take a
stock R/T.
-R/T

Rekker21@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 9/24/98 8:50:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> DodgeBoyz3@aol.com writes:
>
> << But really, my 95, 5.2L,SLT will smoke my own R/T..........Hmmmm,
wheres
> that
> N02 kit I ordered last year?
> >>
> Gene, are you joking?
> Eric

--
Mailto:rotrottmann@davidson.edu
http://www.davidson.edu/personal/rotrottmann/default.htm
Davidson, NC
95 Sport 318 Auto 2WD

Next message: Bridges, Bruce: "RE: Respect the big 3"
Previous message: Kevin Bonanno: "3.9 noise"
Maybe reply: Mok, Alan: "RE: Re: 5.2 Sport vs R/T"
Maybe reply: Bridges, Bruce: "RE: Re: 5.2 Sport vs R/T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:00 EDT