Re: RE: Rotary engines

From: N2mopars@aol.com
Date: Sat Sep 26 1998 - 01:24:22 EDT


In a message dated 98-09-25 13:05:37 EDT, you write:

<< GM bought the U.S. manufacturing rights to the Wankel, and
 Honda CVCC, engine. Then shelved them, never intending to produce the
 engines. The logic was to keep these highly efficient engines from
 displacing the crappy engines being produced by GM (and Ford & Chryco). A
 twin rotary Wankel engine produced more useable horse power over a greater
 RPM range than anything produced at the time.
                 You can get the facts on this from the Library if you think
 I'm not telling the truth. GM has used it's monetary muscle to pull quite a
 number of less than kosher deals. That is my main objection to them, not the
 quality of their vehicles.
                 Example: When Chrysler imported Mitsubishi's they were
 labeled " Imported by Mitsubishi for Chryco". When GM imported Japanese
 vehicles, they were labeled GEO, and nothing was ever mentioned about who
 actually manufactured them. John Q. Public was lead to believe that these
 were genuine GM products.
 
 Sorry, I'll shut up now.
 
 Jon H
>>

I work for Mazda. Rotary's are awesome, WHEN THEY RUN RIGHT! Otherwise, they
suck.

Brad



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:04 EDT