Re: RE: Late Daks w/o CATs Just for the record,

From: GSWillhite (GSWillhite@ualr.edu)
Date: Wed Sep 30 1998 - 13:08:59 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>
> Just for the record, I haven't gotten the CKC module to work yet.
> (Although now I think I know why.) You WILL get a check engine light
> without some sort of fakery (or a high flow cat). Some people just
> take out the cat and don't worry about the check engine light. It
> doesn't hurt anything, but I don't like to have the light on because
> it could hide other (real) problems. I could just buy a module, but
> I'm having fun screwing around with this one. :-)
>
> -Jon-
>

Sense Patrick isn't getting an MIL, I think I'll try removing
the sensor. Just to see if I get a reaction from the computer.
I have a block diagram of Sean's CKC module and may try to
breadboard something that will keep the voltage in the
specified range.

GS



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:11 EDT