[Fwd: About R/Ts]

From: Alan Short (ashort@flash.net)
Date: Mon Oct 26 1998 - 20:56:19 EST


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------4DEC5E553BF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

R/T's are for going FAST. You can't do that when you're 7' in the air
with 40" Mudders. You can still haul a 6,000 lb load with the R/T
though, and how about a .90 G turn or two? Alan S.

--------------4DEC5E553BF1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net>
Received: from phobos.flash.net (phobos.flash.net [209.30.0.42])
        by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00222;
        Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:08:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
        by phobos.flash.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA11686;
        Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:08:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) id SAA24806 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:02:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from buffnet9.buffnet.net (buffnet9.buffnet.net [205.246.19.19]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA24801 for <dakota-truck>; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:02:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by buffnet9.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
        id xma017489; Mon, 26 Oct 98 18:00:10 -0500
Received: from slate.bw.edu (slate-outside.bw.edu [192.150.115.14])
        by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA04292
        for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:02:43 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from cameyer@bw.edu)
Received: from localhost (cameyer@localhost)
        by slate.bw.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA07539
        for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:01:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:01:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Corey A Meyer <cameyer@bw.edu>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: About R/Ts
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.981026175324.8739B-100000@slate.bw.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to majordomo@buffnet.net.
X-Unsubscribe-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-BIN/dml.html
        

        I have a complaint. Now don't get me wrong, I am all for Dakota
trucks, but in my opinion, if a truck isn't high with big tires, it just
isn't completely a truck. I was excited when the 5.9L R/Ts came out.
Butt my heart sank when I realized there was no 4x4 version. Now I feel
that no matter how cool a truck is, if it can't be high with big tires,
then it isn't worth getting.
        I feel the same way about lowering. How could anyone want to
lower any truck, let alone the greatest of them all, our Dakotas. Now
speed is one thing, but when you lower your truck down to the level of
other less worthy trucks and even cars, I believe you have degraded your
vehicle. No amount of speed is worth having a truck sitting on the
ground-is it still a truck?
        This is how I feel and no one will ever change that but feel free
to defend yourselves lowriders.

Corey
"The only good truck is one that could run over a new Beetle and not even
realize it, the rest might as well be chebbies or even Nissans!"

--------------4DEC5E553BF1--



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:47 EDT