Frank, I'd take a TB TODAY. Want me to come up this weekend?? HE HE
(Seriously).... Want my old one?
Sam '95 SLT
-----Original Message-----
From: Holloway,Frank T <Frank.T.Holloway@KP.ORG>
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net' <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Thursday, November 05, 1998 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: RE:Truck 360 Dyno results attn. Gary
>Gary,
>I do have some dyno results from my truck, unfortunately they are prior to
>and after the installation of the Stage II TB. Bruce Bridges has tried both
>the Stage I and
>the Stage II at the strip and hasn't noticed any quantifiable differences
>between the two. Bob M. currently has the Stage I installed on his truck. I
>don't have the
>sheets right here in front of me but a do remember some of the results.
>Below are the numbers and all tests were run on a Clayton Dyno adjusted to
>Std. Temp and
>Pressure.
>
>
>Truck -- 1998 Dodge Ram Quad Cab 5.9L
> Exhaust Flowmaster three chamber (52552)
> JET Stage II chip
> Kenne Bell cold air induction system
> Crane Hi-6 ignition module
> Autolite 5224 Double Platinum plugs
> MSD 8.5 MM plug wires
> Borg Warner distributor cap and rotor
>
>Horsepower (rear wheel) 202@ 4,900
>
>Horsepower (rear wheel) 231@ 4,900 - Stage II TB installed
>
>Horsepower (rear wheel) 236 @ 4,900 - Stage II TB + Lucas 270 CC injectors
>installed
>
>Given the results that Bruce has had, I would imagine that the Stage I
would
>be pretty close to the Stage II, a little less on the 5.2L engines......
>
> Frank
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gary Shook [SMTP:gary.shook@mci.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 1998 12:55 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE:Truck 360
>>
>>
>> >Sam,
>> >I never disappeared, I have just been busy here at work. I am still
>> working
>> >on the TB's though. We are ready to start shipping some of these.
>> > Frank
>> >
>> just wondering, what were the results of dyno testing?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:59 EDT