"unsubscribe dakota-truck"
>(width) and aspect ratios to keep same diameter
> Speedometer Check / Calculate speed over measured mile
> Calculate Lap Speed(MPH) over measured distance from distance and time
> NOTE: Consult included files TRACK.SZ and ATRACK.SZ for many common
>track sizes in miles.
> Calculate Lap time over measured distance from distance and Lap Speed
> Calculate Track Size / measured distance from Lap Speed(MPH) and time
> Calculate Skidpad G's from Track Size and Lap time
> Convert PSI to " of Mercury, kPa, " of Water, cm of Mercury and kg/cm^2
> Convert " of Mercury to PSI, kPa, " of Water, cm of Mercury and kg/cm^2
> Convert kPa to PSI, " of Mercury, " of Water, cm of Mercury and kg/cm^2
> Convert " of Water to PSI, kPa, " of Mercury, cm of Mercury and kg/cm^2
> Convert cm of Mercury to PSI, " of Mercury, kPa, " of Water and kg/cm^2
> Convert kg/cm^2 to PSI, " of Mercury, kPa, " of Water and cm of Mercury
> Convert inches of vaccum to absolute PSI
> Convert absolute PSI to inches of vaccum
> Convert MilliMeters(MM) to inches
> Convert Microns to inches
> Convert inches to MilliMeters(MM)
> Convert Cubic centimeters(CC) to Cubic inches and Fluid ounces
> Convert Cubic inches to Cubic centimeters(CC) and Fluid ounces
> Convert Fluid ounces to Cubic inches and Cubic centimeters(CC)
> Convert ft-lb to N-m (Newton-meter) and m-kg
> Convert N-m (Newton-meter) to ft-lb and m-kg
> Convert m-kg to ft-lb and N-m (Newton-meter)
> Convert lb to N (Newton) and kg
> Convert N (Newton) to lb and kg
> Convert kg to lb and N (Newton)
> Convert Ounces to Grams
> Convert Grams to Ounces
> Convert deg. Fahrenheit to deg. Celsius
> Convert deg. Celsius to deg. Fahrenheit
> Convert MPH to kilometers/hr. (km/h)
> Convert kilometers/hr. (km/h) to MPH
> Convert BTU to Joules
> Convert ft-lb to Joules
> Convert kW-hr to Joules
> Convert Calorie to Joules
> Convert Joules
> Show Decimal Fraction Equivalence Chart
> Show Decimal Equivalence Size of the Number Drills
> Show Decimal Equivalence Size of the Alpha Drills
> Show Decimal (Inches .01) Metric(MM) Equivalence Chart
> Show Decimal (Inches .1) Metric(MM) Equivalence Chart
> Show Decimal (Inches) Metric(MM) Equivalence Chart
> Show Metric(MM .01) Decimal(Inches) Equivalence Chart
> Show Metric(MM .1) Decimal(Inches) Equivalence Chart
> Show Metric(MM) Decimal(Inches) Equivalence Chart
> Show PSI to kPa Chart
> Show kPa to PSI Chart
>
>Awesome huh?
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
><> (JOHN G. OLDEN) jgolden@prairienet.org <>
><> IDDA: 1123 (Membership Officer) <>
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:16:53 -0600
>From: Alan Short <ashort@flash.net>
>Subject: [Fwd: DML: Gas Mileage or lack of...]
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>- --------------7C595D9B1649
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>All I can say is, be thankful you didn't get an R/T. It also got poor
>gas mileage to start with(11 mpg city), but as it broke in at about
>10,000 mi. the mileage was very close to sticker(14 mpg). If you're
>already past 10,000mi try changeing the oil. Alan S.
>
>- --------------7C595D9B1649
>Content-Type: message/rfc822
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>Return-Path: <owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net>
>Received: from phobos.flash.net (phobos.flash.net [209.30.0.42])
> by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA22447;
> Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:43:44 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
> by phobos.flash.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA14159;
> Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:43:42 -0600 (CST)
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3)
id SAA02553 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:40:30 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net
[205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA02535
for <dakota-truck>; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:40:25 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet5.buffnet.net(205.246.19.14) by buffnet1.buffnet.net
via smap (V2.0)
> id xma019719; Fri, 13 Nov 98 18:36:28 -0500
>Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by buffnet5.buffnet.net
via smap (V2.0)
> id xma017104; Fri, 13 Nov 98 18:35:53 -0500
>Received: from tegan.swt.edu (tegan.swt.edu [147.26.10.12])
> by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA23961
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:38:15 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from hm15233@nyssa.swt.edu)
>Received: from kg14392.swt.edu (port4.modem2.cc.swt.edu)
> by swt.edu (PMDF V5.1-12 #20823) with SMTP id <01J44T4KSH8499ORRT@swt.edu> for
> dakota-truck@buffnet.net; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:36:13 CDT
>Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:42:12 -0800
>From: Heather - Intensely Bluetiful Dakota <hm15233@nyssa.swt.edu>
>Subject: DML: Gas Mileage or lack of...
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Message-id: <01be0f70$0050c640$24fa1a93@kg14392.swt.edu>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>X-Priority: 3
>Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
>X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
>X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
>X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to majordomo@buffnet.net.
>X-Unsubscribe-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-BIN/dml.html
>
>Ok, I have mentioned this before and got no response.
>
>I am getting 18 mpg on my truck in the *small* city and 20 on a long trip on
>the highway...my sticker tells me I should be getting 20/25 - least I think
>it does. Why would I be getting such bad gas mileage? Or is it all that
>bad? I'm having a hard time adjusting from my Shadow of 32 mpg to this
>truck in the first place, but if something is wrong, I wanna know cause I
>keep looking in my pocket and it's empty...can't even go see a movie since I
>bought this damn thing. I have to put gas in it like 3 times in two weeks.
>
>I keep reminding myself that I got the greatest truck made to ease my
>mind...
>
>
>Heather
>98 Dak Sport 4cyl 5spd
>Intensely Bluetiful
>San Marcos, Tx
>
>http://members.tripod.com/~DisneyanaWorld
>
>ICQ# 8603100
>
>
>
>- --------------7C595D9B1649--
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:51:56 -0600
>From: Alan Short <ashort@flash.net>
>Subject: [Fwd: DML: My friday drag results! (attn BKB)]
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>- --------------65C1509869F1
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Man, is this ever killing me. I cannot believe that a STOCK R/T will run
>a 14.32 @ 93mph. I have an R/T with a JET II, 180 stat, K&N element and
>electric fans, and my best time is 15.1 @ 90 mph. This is a huge
>difference that couldn't be an altitude/temp difference could it? Stock
>this truck ran a 16.2 @ 84mph. Are you sure you were reading YOUR lane?
>If I sound bitter, it's because I am, and jelous too! If your times are
>accurate, you have the FASTEST R/T ever known to us or Chrysler. God
>bless you and your incredible luck. Alan S.
>
>- --------------65C1509869F1
>Content-Type: message/rfc822
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>Return-Path: <owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net>
>Received: from phobos.flash.net (phobos.flash.net [209.30.0.42])
> by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28612;
> Sun, 15 Nov 1998 11:17:51 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
> by phobos.flash.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA08352;
> Sun, 15 Nov 1998 11:17:49 -0600 (CST)
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3)
id MAA01437 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:15:00 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net
[205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA01430
for <dakota-truck>; Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:14:57 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet5.buffnet.net(205.246.19.14) by buffnet1.buffnet.net
via smap (V2.0)
> id xma023907; Sun, 15 Nov 98 12:12:57 -0500
>Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by buffnet5.buffnet.net
via smap (V2.0)
> id xma015916; Sun, 15 Nov 98 12:11:55 -0500
>Received: from imo16.mx.aol.com (imo16.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.6])
> by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA23745
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:14:30 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from Dyno05@aol.com)
>From: Dyno05@aol.com
>Received: from Dyno05@aol.com
> by imo16.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id VITAa07909
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:11:40 -0500 (EST)
>Message-ID: <adf70874.364f0b4c@aol.com>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:11:40 EST
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Subject: DML: My friday drag results! (attn BKB)
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 64
>Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
>X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
>X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
>X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to majordomo@buffnet.net.
>X-Unsubscribe-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-BIN/dml.html
>
>Hey fellas,
>
> I took m y 98 RC R/T to Atco NJ for some testing for the day. All I have
>done is a Jet 2 module and my own fresh air intake. I tried out some new 26x10
>slicks also which I didnt really gain any et. but made more consistent
>launches. It was 52 degrees and 40 % humidity. Best et of 14.32@ 93 mph.
>Not that shabby I do say myself. The average for the day was 14.50s @ 92 mph.
>I also tested out again ( sorry Bruce) my little nitrous system. =( I only
>made 2 runs, and the bottle was very cold and I didnt heat it up , but I ran a
>13.27 at 100 mph. Definately would have dipped into the 12s with a warmer
>bottle. Ive noticed that by leaving the line with the tranny in 2nd, and
>letting the truck shift on its own to 2nd, but shifting yourself about 200 to
>300 rpm more in second nets better ets. At least that is how my truck
>responds. I know everyones isnt the same, but it works for me. My 60 foot
>times were all in the 2.0s with the radials and the slicks. On the gas they
>were 1.84 with the Micky Thompsons.
>
> As soon as I get my hands on that mysterious Stage 2 throttle body, and some
>headers I expect to be dipping into the high 13s.And that is with NO internal
>modifications just bolt ons! I want to see how fast I can get this thing to
>go without changing anything internal......yet. hehehe
>
>Dana W. 98 intense blue RC R/T
>
>p.s. I also tested the Gtech Pro performance analyzer, and it was 3 tenths
>off. It said I was going 3 tenths faster than I really was and 4 mph more
>also. But it was consistantly wrong, so It CAN be used to measure how much
>your mods are working.
>
>
>- --------------65C1509869F1--
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 13:24:44 -0600
>From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
>Subject: DML: Re: Re: Dyno numbers
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_01FF_01BE109B.4F45C3A0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>1100 miles
>
>Swede/
> =20
> =20
> My '95 modified 5.2L , with 5 speed, DT headers, K&N FIPK, 3" =
>exhaust, and mopar computer put out 212 hp, and 277 ft/lb torque.
> =20
> How many miles on your truck???
> =20
> Sam '95 SLT
> ICQ #6693355 "Maverick"
> =20
> =20
> =20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Saturday, November 14, 1998 4:09 PM
> Subject: DML: Dyno numbers
> =20
> =20
> I need some help here to compare dyno # with somebody else that =
>have dyno tested a complete stock R/T 5.9 and a regular 5.2. I dyno =
>tested my -99 R/T CC 5.9 today and got really disappointed. Here are =
>some numbers:
> =20
> 3700rpm / 247ft/lb torque
> 4700rpm / 189 HP
> =20
> This is @ rearwheel. We attached a K/N cone filter right on the =
>round baffle on the TB, HP increased with 1 (one) HP.
> Please get back to me with some # that I can compare with, I =
>think the factory have installed a 5.2 in my truck. I will check it at =
>work on Monday, and if they have..............well lawsue comes to mind, =
>because they charge me $1585 extra for a 5.9
> I would like if you could e-mail me direct instead of to the =
>list.
> =20
> Swede at Huffines Dodge=20
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_01FF_01BE109B.4F45C3A0
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><HTML>
><HEAD>
>
><META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
>http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
>HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>1100 miles</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2>Swede/</FONT></DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
>5px">
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR> </DIV></FONT>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>My '95 modified 5.2L , with 5 =
>speed, DT=20
> headers, K&N FIPK, 3" exhaust, and mopar computer put out =
>212 hp,=20
> and 277 ft/lb torque.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>How many miles on your truck???</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Sam '95 SLT</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>ICQ =
>#6693355=20
> "Maverick"<BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original=20
> Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Eric <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:erich@dhc.net">erich@dhc.net</A>><BR><B>To: =
></B><A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>=20
> <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>>=
><BR><B>Date:=20
> </B>Saturday, November 14, 1998 4:09 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>DML: =
>Dyno=20
> numbers<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I need some help here to =
>compare dyno #=20
> with somebody else that have dyno tested a complete stock R/T =
>5.9 and a=20
> regular 5.2. I dyno tested my -99 R/T CC 5.9 today and got =
>really=20
> disappointed. Here are some numbers:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>3700rpm / 247ft/lb torque</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>4700rpm / 189 HP</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>This is @ rearwheel. We attached a K/N cone =
>filter=20
> right on the round baffle on the TB, HP increased with 1 (one)=20
> HP.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Please get back to me with some # that I can =
>compare=20
> with, I think the factory have installed a 5.2 in my truck. I =
>will check=20
> it at work on Monday, and if they have..............well lawsue =
>comes to=20
> mind, because they charge me $1585 extra for a 5.9</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I would like if you could e-mail me direct =
>instead of=20
> to the list.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Swede at Huffines Dodge=20
></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_01FF_01BE109B.4F45C3A0--
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 13:31:01 MST
>From: Dave Thede <tnadoman@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: DML: Dyno numbers
>
>Unmodified at 5200 ft, my '97 V8/5-spd measured 188.0 horsepower and
>267.3 torque. I've got the Gibson split cat-back, K&N FIPK clone covered
>up by my homemade ram air. I'm guessing that if you correct it to
>sea-level (add 25%?) it comes to 235 horsepower and 334 ft/lbs torque. I
>also had about 21,000 miles when I tested it on the Dyno-Jet in Denver.
>
>Dave
>'97 Sport+ CC V8/5-spd 4x4
>K&N FIPK clone
>Gibson split cat-back
>homemade ram-air
>http://members.xoom.com/tnadoman
>
>
>>From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
>>
>>1100 miles
>>
>>Swede/
>
>> My '95 modified 5.2L , with 5 speed, DT headers, K&N FIPK, 3" =
>>exhaust, and mopar computer put out 212 hp, and 277 ft/lb torque.
>> =20
>> How many miles on your truck???
>> =20
>> Sam '95 SLT
>> ICQ #6693355 "Maverick"
>> =20
>> =20
>> =20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>> Date: Saturday, November 14, 1998 4:09 PM
>> Subject: DML: Dyno numbers
>> =20
>> =20
>> I need some help here to compare dyno # with somebody else that
>=
>>have dyno tested a complete stock R/T 5.9 and a regular 5.2. I dyno =
>>tested my -99 R/T CC 5.9 today and got really disappointed. Here are =
>>some numbers:
>> =20
>> 3700rpm / 247ft/lb torque
>> 4700rpm / 189 HP
>> =20
>> This is @ rearwheel. We attached a K/N cone filter right on the
>=
>>round baffle on the TB, HP increased with 1 (one) HP.
>> Please get back to me with some # that I can compare with, I =
>>think the factory have installed a 5.2 in my truck. I will check it at
>=
>>work on Monday, and if they have..............well lawsue comes to
>mind, =
>>because they charge me $1585 extra for a 5.9
>> I would like if you could e-mail me direct instead of to the =
>>list.
>> =20
>> Swede at Huffines Dodge=20
>>
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 15:36:29 -0500 (EST)
>From: HKUSP40578@ao.com
>Subject: DML: Acceration problems
>
>My 93 Dakota V6 4x4 auto with 96,000 miles has an acceleration problem.
>Lately it seems like I have to push down on the gas pedal farther to get
>going from a stop. I test drove a 94 Dakota V6 with 75,000 miles on it to
>compare how far I have to push down on the gas pedal, and this Dakota was
>very responsive. My truck doesnt burn and oil and the gas mileage is still
>the same, but its like my truck takes a long time to get going. Past 25-30
>mph acceleration is fine, and over 50 its great. Is my first gear going in
>my tranny??? I have always changed the tranny fluid, gasket, and filter
>every 25-30,000 miles. When the truck shifts at like 15-20 I can tell its
>there cause it shifts hard and solid. SO the tranny isnt slipping. I have
>heard by about adjusting the kickdown cable but this really leads to other
>problems. Any suggestions???
>Kyle
>-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> (__) ,---------. NOTE: The preceding message was sent via Jaek and
> (oo) | :\/: _ _ \ Jon's WWW mail cow gateway. That is to say, the
> /-------\/_/ : :: :: : ) person who sent this message could in fact be an
> / | MAIL|| \_ ' '`-'`-'/ anonymous prankster. Even though this message was
>* ||"" || \__________/ mailed to you from the cs.fredonia.edu domain, it
> ^^ ^^ could have been generated by anyone in the world.
>Please keep this in mind. Thank you! --Jaek (smit2204) and -Jon- (stei0302)
>-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 16:10:19 EST
>From: BlKV8Dkota@aol.com
>Subject: Re: DML: TB list, stage ONE Only!Attn Bruce
>
>How will the core exchange work? Would I be able to send my throttle body
>after I get the new one and put it on and is it really only 90 dollars for
>everything? Could I please get some estimated performance numbers? And do
>you get any extra torque of the line because that is what I am most concerned
>about?
>
>Josh
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 15:30:31 -0600
>From: Daniel Colucci <djcolucci@worldnet.att.net>
>Subject: DML: Sunday at the Drags
>
>Just got back from running my 98 CC R/T at Great lakes Dragway in Wis. The
>best time was 14.68 @ 95.3 mph. 60 foot time was 2.228. I am still a
>little disappointed with these times. I have a Vortech, JBA's, and 2 1/2
>"y" into a 3 inch cat and 3 inch Flow Pro. I was expecting better times.
>Traction is terrible. I really feel that the limiting factors for me with
>the SC are the computer and traction. This thing should be running better
>than what it is. But I never tested it stock so I don't know how much I
>picked up from there. There was a RC R/T running 15.40's at 89 mph.
>
>Dan
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 16:31:57 EST
>From: Rekker21@aol.com
>Subject: DML: wasTB list,stage ONE Only!:Fuel pressure
>
>In a message dated 11/15/98 11:23:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>Frank.T.Holloway@KP.ORG writes:
>
><< We are playing with larger injectors and/or the option of
> increasing fuel pressure under WOT. If you are interested, send Bruce
> Bridges a post.
> >>
> Speaking of fuel pressure, how can you tell what your fuel rail is at and
>how can ya increase it?
>Eric, fuel pressure illiterate
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 16:46:56 EST
>From: Rekker21@aol.com
>Subject: Re: DML: Sunday at the Drags
>
>In a message dated 11/15/98 4:37:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>djcolucci@worldnet.att.net writes:
>
><< Just got back from running my 98 CC R/T at Great lakes Dragway in Wis. The
> best time was 14.68 @ 95.3 mph. 60 foot time was 2.228. I am still a
> little disappointed with these times. I have a Vortech, JBA's, and 2 1/2
> "y" into a 3 inch cat and 3 inch Flow Pro. I was expecting better times.
> Traction is terrible. I really feel that the limiting factors for me with
> the SC are the computer and traction. This thing should be running better
> than what it is. But I never tested it stock so I don't know how much I
> picked up from there. There was a RC R/T running 15.40's at 89 mph. >>
> Alan,
> I think Im in this thing with you. How can this thing be running mid 14's
>with a super and get beat by a low 14 second stock R/T? Im a bit curious too!
>Eric
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 15:34:42 -0500
>From: The Man From Utopia <tmfu@bellatlantic.net>
>Subject: DML: RE: Re: Daks in NJ.
>
>That would be an idea for something to do around Spring time..
>
>Greg
>95 DSCC v6 5spd
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>Dyno05@aol.com
>Sent: Sunday, November 15, 1998 11:38 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Re: Daks in NJ.
>
>
>
>I live In CT. And was wondering what kind of get togethers you were looking
>for. Drag racing preferably?
>
>Dana W.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 16:49:04 -0500
>From: Chris <Clam9892@postoffice.uri.edu>
>Subject: DML: V-6 auto to manual
>
>Ok guys here' the story, this guy in a little toyota tried to run me at a
>light, and well let's just say i had him... then my A-500 went to shift
>into second, won't shift. I backed off the gas to get it to shift. No
>shift, this time no gears at all so i coasted to the side of the road and
>checked the obvious, fluid was good, right level and all... now what? the
>truck is at the garage to be checked. The tranny was comepletely rebuilt
>25,000 mi ago and now this. i think that this auto isn't made for my
>driving style/ horsepower demands. My qustion: what is involed in
>switching out the auto in my 88 dak in favor of a 5, maybe 6speed standard
>tranny? also prices if anyone has any idea about the financhial burden.
>
>Thanks,
>Chris
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 13:46:59 -0800
>From: Sam Parthemer <srp@home.com>
>Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Dyno numbers
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_0080_01BE109E.6AE014A0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Your engine is still tight, 1100 miles isn't anything. Wait until =
>5-8k... that's when
>it should be working a lot better. My wife's RT has 2100 miles on it, =
>and performance
>and mileage are getting better everyday. My '95 was fully broke in =
>around
>5000 miles, and I'd expect the same out of my wife's truck (and yours).
>
>Sam '95 SLT
>Sonya '99 RT
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Sunday, November 15, 1998 11:34 AM
> Subject: DML: Re: Re: Dyno numbers
> =20
> =20
> 1100 miles
> =20
> Swede/
> =20
> =20
> My '95 modified 5.2L , with 5 speed, DT headers, K&N FIPK, 3" =
>exhaust, and mopar computer put out 212 hp, and 277 ft/lb torque.
> =20
> How many miles on your truck???
> =20
> Sam '95 SLT
> ICQ #6693355 "Maverick"
> =20
> =20
> =20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Saturday, November 14, 1998 4:09 PM
> Subject: DML: Dyno numbers
> =20
> =20
> I need some help here to compare dyno # with somebody else =
>that have dyno tested a complete stock R/T 5.9 and a regular 5.2. I dyno =
>tested my -99 R/T CC 5.9 today and got really disappointed. Here are =
>some numbers:
> =20
> 3700rpm / 247ft/lb torque
> 4700rpm / 189 HP
> =20
> This is @ rearwheel. We attached a K/N cone filter right on =
>the round baffle on the TB, HP increased with 1 (one) HP.
> Please get back to me with some # that I can compare with, I =
>think the factory have installed a 5.2 in my truck. I will check it at =
>work on Monday, and if they have..............well lawsue comes to mind, =
>because they charge me $1585 extra for a 5.9
> I would like if you could e-mail me direct instead of to the =
>list.
> =20
> Swede at Huffines Dodge=20
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_0080_01BE109E.6AE014A0
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><HTML>
><HEAD>
>
><META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
>http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
>HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML =
>PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Your engine is still tight, 1100 =
>miles isn't=20
>anything. Wait until 5-8k... that's when</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>it should be =
>working a lot=20
>better. My wife's RT has 2100 miles on it, and =
>performance</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2>and mileage are getting better everyday. My =
>'95 was=20
>fully broke in around</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2>5000 miles, and I'd expect the same out of my wife's =
>truck=20
>(and yours).</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2>Sam '95 SLT</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2>Sonya '99 RT</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
>5px">
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original =
>Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20
> </B>Eric <<A =
>href=3D"mailto:erich@dhc.net">erich@dhc.net</A>><BR><B>To:=20
> </B><A =
>href=3D"mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>=20
> <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>>=
><BR><B>Date:=20
> </B>Sunday, November 15, 1998 11:34 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>DML: Re: =
>Re: Dyno=20
> numbers<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>1100 miles</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Swede/</FONT></DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR> </DIV></FONT>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>My '95 modified 5.2L , with =
>5 speed, DT=20
> headers, K&N FIPK, 3" exhaust, and mopar computer put =
>out 212=20
> hp, and 277 ft/lb torque.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>How many miles on your truck???</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Sam '95 SLT</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>ICQ =
>#6693355=20
> "Maverick"<BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original=20
> Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Eric <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:erich@dhc.net">erich@dhc.net</A>><BR><B>To: </B><A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>=20
> <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>>=
><BR><B>Date:=20
> </B>Saturday, November 14, 1998 4:09 PM<BR><B>Subject: =
></B>DML: Dyno=20
> numbers<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I need some help here to =
>compare=20
> dyno # with somebody else that have dyno tested a complete =
>stock R/T=20
> 5.9 and a regular 5.2. I dyno tested my -99 R/T CC 5.9 today =
>and got=20
> really disappointed. Here are some numbers:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>3700rpm / 247ft/lb torque</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>4700rpm / 189 HP</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>This is @ rearwheel. We attached a K/N =
>cone filter=20
> right on the round baffle on the TB, HP increased with 1 =
>(one)=20
> HP.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Please get back to me with some # that I =
>can=20
> compare with, I think the factory have installed a 5.2 in my =
>truck.=20
> I will check it at work on Monday, and if they=20
> have..............well lawsue comes to mind, because they =
>charge me=20
> $1585 extra for a 5.9</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I would like if you could e-mail me =
>direct instead=20
> of to the list.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Swede at Huffines Dodge=20
> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_0080_01BE109E.6AE014A0--
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 13:48:40 -0800
>From: Sam Parthemer <srp@home.com>
>Subject: DML: Re: Acceration problems
>
>My '95 V8 4x2 just hit 99000 miles, and about 250 miles back I had a
>CAT replaced because the original came apart. Your mileage is close
>to mine.. maybe you have a plugged CAT???
>
>Sam '95 SLT
>
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: HKUSP40578@ao.com <HKUSP40578@ao.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Sunday, November 15, 1998 12:42 PM
>Subject: DML: Acceration problems
>
>
>>My 93 Dakota V6 4x4 auto with 96,000 miles has an acceleration problem.
>>Lately it seems like I have to push down on the gas pedal farther to get
>>going from a stop. I test drove a 94 Dakota V6 with 75,000 miles on it to
>>compare how far I have to push down on the gas pedal, and this Dakota was
>>very responsive. My truck doesnt burn and oil and the gas mileage is still
>>the same, but its like my truck takes a long time to get going. Past 25-30
>>mph acceleration is fine, and over 50 its great. Is my first gear going in
>>my tranny??? I have always changed the tranny fluid, gasket, and filter
>>every 25-30,000 miles. When the truck shifts at like 15-20 I can tell its
>>there cause it shifts hard and solid. SO the tranny isnt slipping. I have
>>heard by about adjusting the kickdown cable but this really leads to other
>>problems. Any suggestions???
>>Kyle
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- -----
>> (__) ,---------. NOTE: The preceding message was sent via Jaek
>and
>> (oo) | :\/: _ _ \ Jon's WWW mail cow gateway. That is to say,
>the
>> /-------\/_/ : :: :: : ) person who sent this message could in fact be
>an
>> / | MAIL|| \_ ' '`-'`-'/ anonymous prankster. Even though this message
>was
>>* ||"" || \__________/ mailed to you from the cs.fredonia.edu domain,
>it
>> ^^ ^^ could have been generated by anyone in the world.
>>Please keep this in mind. Thank you! --Jaek (smit2204) and -Jon-
>(stei0302)
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- -----
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 18:09:52 EST
>From: HKUSP40578@aol.com
>Subject: Re: DML: Re: Acceration problems
>
>In a message dated 98-11-15 17:03:14 EST, you write:
>
><< maybe you have a plugged CAT???
> >>
>
>Well I replaced my cat at 75,000 miles.......maybe this one is bad!
>grrr......Is there any way to tell or check if it is plugged??? The factory
>cat had a loose baffle so I replaced it cause it was rattling really loudly.
>thanks
>Kyle
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 19:09:27 EST
>From: PHaTKLoWN1@aol.com
>Subject: DML: EXCESSIVE MUFFLER NOISE
>
>Ok i have a 92 dakota 3.9L V6 with a 3 inch gibson exhaust syastem. I got
>pulled over the other night for excessive muffler noise. My question is will
>my truck pass the california highway patrol decibal test?????
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 18:43:03 -0600
>From: Eric <erich@dhc.net>
>Subject: DML: Dyno & 1/4 Mile
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_0248_01BE10C7.C7349180
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>If you go to my home page www.dhc.net/~erich you can see my Dyno numbers =
>and a Magazine 1/4 mile test on a 98 R/T
>
>Swede/
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_0248_01BE10C7.C7349180
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><HTML>
><HEAD>
>
><META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
>http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
><META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>If you go to my home page <A=20
>href=3D"http://www.dhc.net/~erich">www.dhc.net/~erich</A> you can see my =
>Dyno=20
>numbers and a Magazine 1/4 mile test on a 98 R/T</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Swede/</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>- ------=_NextPart_000_0248_01BE10C7.C7349180--
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 19:48:07 EST
>From: HKUSP40578@aol.com
>Subject: Re: DML: Re: Acceleration problems
>
>Is the only way to tell if a CAT is bad is by that rotten eg test? or what
>else can I try to see if its bad?
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 20:20:33 EST
>From: DodgeBoyz3@aol.com
>Subject: Re: DML: Sunday at the Drags(Dan)
>
>Hello Dan, how ya been?
>
>Yes I agree with you on those times..........should be much better w/ the SC.
>My 99 CC will click off 15.489's as long as can get the GY RSA's to bite. I
>agree with the SBEC thoughts.
>Well good luck and keep us posted.
>
>Gene in Baytown
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 20:21:43 EST
>From: DodgeBoyz3@aol.com
>Subject: Re: DML: Sunday at the Drags
>
>In a message dated 15-11-98 3:54:08 PM Central Standard Time, Rekker21@aol.com
>writes:
>
>> Alan,
>> I think Im in this thing with you. How can this thing be running mid
>14'
>> s
>> with a super and get beat by a low 14 second stock R/T? Im a bit curious
>> too!
>> Eric
>Me tooooooooooooooooooooooo???
>
>Gene
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 19:27:15 -0600
>From: Ron Merx <ronmerx@nol.net>
>Subject: Re: DML: Sunday at the Drags
>
>Daniel Colucci wrote:
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:01 EDT