If you would take the time to read EVERYTHING you may notice I wasn't
responding to you.
To use a MAF requires re engineering the entire electronincs package,
besides there are some very serious concerns about the MAF systems like
linearity of the sensor, temp effects on the sensor, etc. Speed density is
considered to be the superior system by the majority of engineering types.
I understand your frustration with the speed density system and its lack of
adaptibility to engine mods. BTW I believe Jules can have your PCM
reprogrammed.
KW
-----Original Message-----
From: William Blount Arthur <m990198@nadn.navy.mil>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Monday, November 30, 1998 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Speed density
>> I don't believe CC (befor the merger) owned Siemens, They're a very large
>> German Electronics firm.
>>
>> Mass air flow is not all that it is cracked up to be either. The flow
sensor
>> presents a significant restriction.
>>
>> All modern CC FI systems are speed density.
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>I dont care who owns siemens, what I am asking is has anyone toyed with
>the idea of putting mass air on a ram? You can get 80 mm mass air meters
>and I dont think it is too restrictive since it doesnt strangle my buddys
>400 hp mustang. The mass air set up would be much more responsive to
>changes is flow than the speed density, which has no idea how much air is
>actually getting through.
>
>Bill
>'97 SS/T
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:07 EDT