Re: Re: Vortech Group Buy... was: Vorteched R/T

From: Michael (mdubose@vt.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 02 1998 - 19:53:23 EST


Well you gotta think that the force that NOS gives out is alot greater than that
of a SC. I have seen cars with SC on them go 100,000+ miles with alot tender
loveing care...I have also seen cars on NOS blow holes in the pistons on the
first try...there are alot a variables with NOS as compared to a SC. Yes there
are alot of variables with a SC but most of them if you make a mistake it will
not damage your engine but with NOS just a little too much and you can blow up
your engine.

Mike

Jack Hilton III wrote:

> At 04:58 PM 12/2/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >Go with the SC..your engine won't be beat to death with a SC like it will
> with
> >NOS.
> >
> >Mike
>
> But what is less destructive , constant pressure from a SC or only limited
> use of the gas ?
>
> >
> >Jack Hilton III wrote:
> >
> >> >> After reading Dans problem with his OBD2 equipped truck, I am wondering
> >> >if a
> >> >> Vortech will work on my 96? Jules? Do they sell em for a 96?
> >> >
> >> >they will work thru 99
> >> >
> >> >jam'n
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> So you guys are workin' the Vortechs on the OBDII trucks with no problem ?
> >>
> >> I am trying to decide between a kit from Nitrous Express or a SC and am
> >> weighing the costs . Sure , the NOS is cheaper up front , but after the
> >> bottle refills and such , it doesn't fall too short of a sucker .
> >>
> >> Jules , what in your opinion is the best sucker for these trucks , Kenne
> >> Bell or Vortech , and why ?
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Jack Hilton III
> >>
> >> Black 1998 Dodge Dakota R/T Club Cab
> >>
> >> Charter Pipeline......the Next Wave.....
> >>
> >> HEMI@charter.net
> >>
> >> http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
> >
> >
> >
>
> W . Jack Hilton III
>
> HEMI@charter.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:22 EDT