Re: manual-trans

From: Jack Hilton III (HEMI@charter.net)
Date: Thu Dec 10 1998 - 19:37:37 EST


I think the reason that they don't put the manual tranny in the R/T is more
likely to be traction , and therfor , liability .

At 05:56 PM 12/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Help please.....does anyone know of a company that makes aftermarket
transmission parts
>for the nv3500 trans. This trans will not hold up... GEE, I wonder if
that is why there
>not putting the nv3500 trans in the R/T>>duh.. I love my truck but i can't
keep a trans
>in it. Mike..
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> (__) ,---------. NOTE: The preceding message was sent via Jaek
and
> (oo) | :\/: _ _ \ Jon's WWW mail cow gateway. That is to say, the
> /-------\/_/ : :: :: : ) person who sent this message could in fact be
an
> / | MAIL|| \_ ' '`-'`-'/ anonymous prankster. Even though this message
was
>* ||"" || \__________/ mailed to you from the cs.fredonia.edu domain, it
> ^^ ^^ could have been generated by anyone in the world.
>Please keep this in mind. Thank you! --Jaek (smit2204) and -Jon- (stei0302)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>
>

W . Jack Hilton III

HEMI@charter.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:24 EDT