I would certainly be on the list of potential buyers. I've never
owned a practical vehicle in my life. I currently have a Corvette
6spd (Loud, Fast, 8-9 mpg, no back seats, no cargo space) and my R/T (Loud,
Fast, 11mpg on a good tank, no back seat, cargo space that looks uncool
when used). My Vette' has been a parts money pit and my R/T will
be as well. That's what I like. Too bad if I can't take any
more than one person. Any ways, the market sector that this truck
would apply to is the same niche that buys the Vipers & Prowlers.
These are the people that pay $100,000+ cdn for a Hummer just to pick up
groceries in. Alot (not all) of these people are made of money and
love cars that are "cool". I know several of them.
I wish I was one of them.:(
Ryan K
'99 R/T RC
BlKV8Dkota@aol.com wrote:
A V10 Durango would be stupid. Who would by these trucks? Probably less
people than the Viper. This truck would not be as fast as the Viper and
probably more expensive so who is the target market? Plus considering it
probably is the truck V10 and not the vipers it gets about 9 mpg. Who want
that if you don't need the towing capabilities of the engine. It sounds great
in theory but than so does communism. This is a totally impractical truck.
Chrysler should just stick with the SP Durango if the rumor is even true.Josh
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:31 EDT