Guess I will just take that extra $400 smackers I saved on my Camera and
invest in a new set f slicks or something... what a thought... yeah, yeah,
that's the ticket... yeah, yeah...
VLADIMIR
96 Indy "FASRAM"
http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
http://www.indyram.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Sam
Parthemer
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 1999 11:55 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE: DML Digital Cameras (non dak)
Funny thing... I went to that web page, rated EACH picture, and
here's the output from the best pictures (I chose the pictures, it
gave the results).
1: Eastman Kodak DC260
2: Nikon Coolpix 900s
3: Epson Photo PC 700
4: Agfa ePhoto 1280
5: Sanyo VPC-X300
6: HP PhotoSmart C30
I'll go read their recommendations now :P
(The DC50 takes the same quality pictures as my DC40, but with
removeable memory(good), and zoom (good)...) Nothing wrong with
the DC50.... I just want more :O
Sam '95 SLT
>
>Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 12:48:51 PST
>From: Sam Parthemer <maverick_nr552@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: :DML: Digital (LONG)(non Dak related)
>
>Not trying to get into a pissing contest over which camera is better,
>but I'd like to clarify that the DC-210 is a completely different
camera
>
>than the DC-260... Different body style (like a '96 Dakota vs.
>a '97 Dakota), and the DC-210 has a max resolution of 1152 x 864 (and a
>2X zoom), vs. DC-260 max resolution of 1536 x 1024 (and a 6X Zoom
>- - 3X optical and 2X digital zoom.) The closest camera to the
>DC-260, is the lower priced DC-220 with 1152 x 864 (4x zoom, 2x
optical,
>
>and 2x digtal zoom.) The DC-220 looks like a 260, but has the lower
>resolution. The DC220 can do 'audio samples' like the 260.
>Both use USB ports (unlike the DC210 that doesn't).
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:54 EDT