RE: Re: RE: RE: Y2K preparation

From: Jason Jennings (jason@spray-tech.com)
Date: Fri Jan 08 1999 - 14:17:47 EST


Oohhh, sucks to be you man..... I had my share of midnight/weekend
hours... no THANK you... can you say salary, ah overtime yeah
right....hahahahaha....

Jason
1/8/99 2:22 PM

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Gary Shook [SMTP:gary.shook@mci.com]
        Sent: Friday, January 08, 1999 2:05 PM
        To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
        Subject: DML: Re: RE: RE: Y2K preparation

>I guess if you are not in the industry and it is not what pays
for your
>house, kids, wife, vehicles, investments, and living expenses
you don't
>actually see the impact of the Y2K problem.

        or at least any impact to you is out of your control... just
prepare to lose
        services.
        I want to get a generator- I have a well, and won't even have
water without
        power!
        this isn't limited to Y2K- I should have one on hand for
emergencies...

>There are allot of companies out there who have this we will
wait and see
>attitude about Y2K, wait till they get into work the next
Monday and there

        Monday should be a holiday (new years is on Saturday)- a good
day to try
        things out and figure out if you want the whole staff to come in
on
        Tuesday...

>entire operational program that was written in 1986 isn't able
to say
>process orders from the warehouse...maybe they
sell....um....who
>know....widgets for Mopar.....no more widgets.....
>I was talking to a tech at Lucent the other day, he said that
there are
>phone switches out there (in small and remote towns) that are
in no way
>ready for Y2K....no phones could be a problem for some small
communities
>come 2000.

        That's where I live- Penrose... it's not even a town- that would
imply a
        city government- pop. is probably 3 to 4,000. I'll be getting a
digital
        cell phone for backup (maybe for primary, depending on service &
price)

>The state of Colorado is still not Y2K compliant, neither
is....get
>this...the IRS.

        That would be a real good reason to get rid of them, then....
:-)

>The Y2K is not all bad....it is making me more money on the
side now...I
>have calls daily people asking me to check their machines and
networks for
>Y2K compliance, updating BIOS, and installing Windows 98 or
NT...."Thank
>you, that will be $85 an hour."

        It's keeping me busy part of the time, certifying networks for
MCIWorldcom
        customers (particularly NASDAQ)

        Gary Shook



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:55 EDT