Hey guys,
lets knock off the Y2K crap!
----------
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net (DML Digest)
>To: dakota-truck-digest@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>Subject: DML Digest V4 #152
>Date: Tue, Jan 12, 1999, 12:02 AM
>
> DML Digest Tuesday, January 12 1999 Volume 04 : Number 152
>
>
>
> The subjects discussed in this digest are:
> ==========
> DML: 2 inch drop in rear
> DML: RE: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
> Re: DML: Re: RE: Questions:Aftermarket Ignition Coils
> Re: DML: 2 inch drop in rear
> DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
> Re: DML: Will leather durango SEATS fit a 98 Dakota R/T???
> DML: RE: Y2k Prep
> Re: DML: RE:Water wetter was: Amsoil vs. Redline vs. ?
> Re[2]: DML: Amsoil vs. Redline vs. ?
> DML: RE: Quit the Y2K (PATRICK)
> RE: DML: darn hypertech
> Re: DML: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
> Re[2]: DML: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
> Re: DML: 2 inch drop in rear
> RE: DML: darn hypertech
> DML: DML chryslers at carlisle
> DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:36:34 -0500 (EST)
> From: William Blount Arthur <m990198@nadn.navy.mil>
> Subject: DML: 2 inch drop in rear
>
> Well everybody who asked...
>
> I put the 2 inch shackle drop on the truck today. I ordered it from Jegs.
> Wouldnt you know it, the price changed after I ordered it so it was 5
> bucks cheaper than expected. Cool. Anyways, I put it on in about an
> hour, if that, with a little help from my friends. It looks pretty good
> actually, it took some getting used to seeing the bumper that low, but it
> actually looks level. It hangles like it is balanced better which is good
> and it also hooks up good now. I kicked it at a light and it rocks way
> back now, good static weight transfer, and it should have better 60 ft
> times from this I hope. Well, I am not through with this truck yet. I am
> about to go all out and put the Dixie Air horns from JC Whitney on it. It
> all started with those stupid fuzzy dice. Oh well.
>
> Bill
> '97 SS/T
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:59:03 -0500
> From: The Man From Utopia <tmfu@bellatlantic.net>
> Subject: DML: RE: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
>
> Dude I feel for you! Had the happen to my Shadow ES last summer.. Some twit
> couldn't drive his big-assed 4x4 and drove over the driver's side fender.
> Wished I could have found the loser, he and Misters Maglight and Mace would
> of had a word with him.
>
> Greg
> 95 DSCC v6 5spd
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> Dester243@aol.com
>> Sent: Monday, January 11, 1999 9:04 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: DML: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
>>
>>
>> Okay, i'm totally pissed. i've pampered my baby for SOO long, no visible
>> scratches. NOTHING. and now. as i walked to my car, it hits
>> me. some stupid
>> idiot side swiped me. puts a stripe that tore my hear from the
>> rear taillight
>> (with ram head graphic) all the way past the rear wheel and
>> pushes the little
>> hump inward so it looks like a piece of crap. it really pisses
>> me off. to
>> have someone love and pamper something SOO well and to find it
>> all screwed up
>> by an idiot why can't drive. but that's my thoughts, if you see
>> any one in
>> kansas, that has fresh black paint on their car or something, get
>> their plates
>> and i swear to god their pos will suffer.............
>> -Dester
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:55:03 EST
> From: N2mopars@aol.com
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: Questions:Aftermarket Ignition Coils
>
> In a message dated 99-01-10 22:41:39 EST, you write:
>
> << Accell now has a super coil for the magnum engines. Mounts in the same
> location, and plugs right in. FYI.
> >>
>
>
> Good to know. Any part numbers?
>
> Brad
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:05:23 -0600
> From: Michael Styer <mstyer@mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: DML: 2 inch drop in rear
>
> We love those fuzzy dice :) Seriously, you might want to check your
> headlights and see that they're still aimed where they're supposed to be. Do
> you have any pictures posted?
>
> Mike S.
>
> William Blount Arthur wrote:
>
>> Well everybody who asked...
>>
>> I put the 2 inch shackle drop on the truck today. I ordered it from Jegs.
>> Wouldnt you know it, the price changed after I ordered it so it was 5
>> bucks cheaper than expected. Cool. Anyways, I put it on in about an
>> hour, if that, with a little help from my friends. It looks pretty good
>> actually, it took some getting used to seeing the bumper that low, but it
>> actually looks level. It hangles like it is balanced better which is good
>> and it also hooks up good now. I kicked it at a light and it rocks way
>> back now, good static weight transfer, and it should have better 60 ft
>> times from this I hope. Well, I am not through with this truck yet. I am
>> about to go all out and put the Dixie Air horns from JC Whitney on it. It
>> all started with those stupid fuzzy dice. Oh well.
>>
>> Bill
>> '97 SS/T
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:29:51 -0600
> From: Vladimir Ryall <vladimir@austin.rr.com>
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
>
> I can understand completely, I wish you the best of luck. This whole thing
> is Microsoft's fault anyway, right... CAN I GET A "HELL YEAH" !!!!!!!!!
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> Holloway,Frank T
> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 1999 7:24 PM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
>
>
> Vladimir,
>
> I wish I could say the same, we are now in the process of Y2K certification.
> Some of our mainframes need to be replaced (not Y2K compliant). Some of our
> in-house software is 20 years old and still needs to be checked out. We also
> have some of our platforms that still need an OS upgrade. Still a lot of
> work to do and I am nervous....
>
> Frank
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vladimir Ryall [SMTP:vladimir@austin.rr.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 1999 2:01 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preperation
>>
>> Frank,
>>
>> I too support numerous OS adn hardware platforms. Most of these have been
>> Y2K for some time now. I am sure there will be some isolated incidents,
>> but, everall, I think we will all wake up very safe and sound. If there
>> are
>> those companies that have waited till now to address it then, maybe they
>> should not be there in 2000... I wish everyone would relax, but not fall
>> asleep about this.
>>
>> VLADIMIR
>> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
>> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>> http://www.indyram.org/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> Holloway,Frank T
>> Sent: Friday, January 08, 1999 9:21 AM
>> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
>> Subject: DML: RE: RE: Y2K preperation
>>
>>
>> Vladimir,
>> It really is a serious problem and I am worried about it. The company I
>> work
>> for has contracted out the software testing and contracted cost is 8
>> million
>> dollars for verification of the software we have source code for. This
>> problem will even effect things like elevators and environmental controls
>> in
>> buildings. When our networks and software comes crashing down, I am the
>> one
>> that MUST get it back up. I can see many many sleepless nights to get
>> through this one....
>>
>> Frank
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Vladimir Ryall [SMTP:vladimir@austin.rr.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 1999 11:48 PM
>> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> > Subject: DML: RE: Y2K preperation
>> >
>> > You have got to be kidding. Is everyone on edge about this or what. I
>> > suppose there will be a few issues, but, get us a break. I am just
>> > curious
>> > how many folks are in a tizzy about this thing. You probably watch too
>> > much
>> > network TV is my guess. Is there really this much of a feeling of
>> > insecurity out there? I am real curious now...
>> >
>> > VLADIMIR
>> > 96 Indy "FASRAM"
>> > http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>> > http://www.indyram.org/
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> > mike.burgess@akamail.com
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 1999 2:08 PM
>> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> > Subject: DML: Y2K preperation
>> >
>> >
>> > FWIW, heres a couple of opinion laden links about Y2K problems
>> >
>> > Martial Law:
>> > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/19990107_xcbtl_the_ugly_s.shtml
>> > Gvmt Expert on Electrical Power & Distribution (Rick Cowles):
>> > http://www.cbn.org/y2k/cowles.htm
>> > Test programs for PC's:
>> > http://www.euy2k.com/resource.htm
>> >
>> > More predictions:
>> > http://www.ruprecht.com/
>> >
>> > Have fun! Getting my generator picked out, and fuel for 2 months @ 2
>> hrs
>> > a day, to keep the fridge cool.
>> >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > --
>> > ----
>> > (__) ,---------. NOTE: The preceding message was sent via
>> Jaek
>> > and
>> > (oo) | :\/: _ _ \ Jon's WWW mail cow gateway. That is to say,
>> > the
>> > /-------\/_/ : :: :: : ) person who sent this message could in fact
>> be
>> > an
>> > / | MAIL|| \_ ' '`-'`-'/ anonymous prankster. Even though this
>> message
>> > was
>> > * ||"" || \__________/ mailed to you from the cs.fredonia.edu
>> domain,
>> > it
>> > ^^ ^^ could have been generated by anyone in the
>> > world.
>> > Please keep this in mind. Thank you! --Jaek (smit2204) and -Jon-
>> > (stei0302)
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > --
>> > ----
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:27:53 EST
> From: Dkota4by4@aol.com
> Subject: Re: DML: Will leather durango SEATS fit a 98 Dakota R/T???
>
> where did you find them and how much?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:31:53 -0600
> From: Vladimir Ryall <vladimir@austin.rr.com>
> Subject: DML: RE: Y2k Prep
>
> I gues we all need to talk again on January 2 or so, maybe I will still have
> E-Mail...
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Chris
> Gunter
> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 7:52 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Y2k Prep
>
>
> Vladmir you can bet im withdrawing all my money from the bank before
> 2000. The federal goverment has already stashed 56billion dollars to
> distribute to the banks when the run starts...id start preparing now for
> the worst ie food water heat source better to be safe than sorry
>
> Chris
> 97 Dodge Dakota sport
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:31:16 EST
> From: N2mopars@aol.com
> Subject: Re: DML: RE:Water wetter was: Amsoil vs. Redline vs. ?
>
> In a message dated 99-01-11 19:00:26 EST, you write:
>
> << Russ,
> I tried water wetter in my Jensen (British) and my Barracuda (was getting
> hot at high speed). NO noticable difference with the standard guages on
> either vehicle. I think It is basically a surfactant and reduces the
> surface tension of the water to allow better "contact" and heat tranfer. Im
> not a total naysayer, but I cant imagine needing it on anything but an older
> british or italian car with inherent marginal cooling and AL alloy heads or
> blocks. Big chunks of cast iron have too high a thermal mass for real
> improvements from somthing like that. Jet dry dish washing additive seems
> to be basically the same stuff only blue... all of the above is IMO :^).
> Bruce
> >>
>
>
> I noticed a big difference on my Dak using Water Wetter. Have also
> successfully used it in road race cars that used no fans at all, just air
> through the radiator.
>
> Brad
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:28:59 -0500
> From: fawcett@uism.bu.edu
> Subject: Re[2]: DML: Amsoil vs. Redline vs. ?
>
> Is this true Steve!, the Rams have Dana axles??? Hmmmmm... May need to
> trade in the Dak... Naaaahhhhh!! I love my Kota!
>
> Anyway, to try and answer your questions Russ (You got a tall order there,
> bud!). This is all out of the '98 FSM and my $.02 :-)
>
> 1.a. Differential/Axle.
> Rear 8.25 Axle. The housing looks like and oval with 10 bolts holding it
> on. (This is what I have in my '98 4x4 :(
> Rear 9.25 Axle. The housing looks like an octagon with 12 bolts holding it
> on.
> - ---->Both will have an ID tag under one of the bolts for definite
> identification.
> Front 194 FIA Axle... I have no idea what kind of axle this is, nor how it
> compares to say, a DANA 40... There is an ID tag on this one as well.
>
> 1.b. Transfer Case.
> In '97 I don't believe a full-time transfer case was offered so you have
> the NV231 Part-time case.
>
> 1.c. Transmission.
> We have either the 42/44RE or 46RE Automatic Transmissions. "Transmission
> ID numbers are stamped on the left side of the case just above the oil pan
> gasket surface."... I'll need to find out which one I have soon myself :-)
>
> 2. Which Brand.
> I don't know... I'm due for a change in a couple of k myself, so let me
> know what you find out!
>
> 3. Any benefit vis a vie fossil to synthetic?
> Nothing scientific (beyond what I've read) but I've been going synthetic
> simply for durability... Told you I'd give my $.02 :-)
>
> Good luck.
>
> T.
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: Re: DML: Amsoil vs. Redline vs. ?
> Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net> at smtpout
> Date: 1/11/99 5:54 PM
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:44:24 EST, you wrote:
>
>>I have decided to change all my fluids to synthetic (front and rear dif,
>>transfer case, transmission). I called Redline to check on their products,
>>prices, etc. The man I talked to said there were several different difs
>>listed for the 97 Dak including a Dana 44 front and a Dana 60 rear. Three ?s:
>
> I wish there were Dana 44 and 60's available. Tell him to quit looking
> at the Ram axle specs...
>
>
> Steve, 29
> Apache Junction, Arizona
>
> 97' Dakota, CC, 4X4, 5 Speed, all the goodies 'cept anti-lock brakes,
> Mud Flaps, spare-tire lock, Step-Shields, EVSII Alarm, Gibson Single
> 3" Cat-Back,Tow Hooks....
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:34:57 -0600
> From: Vladimir Ryall <vladimir@austin.rr.com>
> Subject: DML: RE: Quit the Y2K (PATRICK)
>
> Ok Pat,
>
> When you can't read your e-mail due to Y2K related problems, the Dak
> information won't be very relevant then will it.
>
> I Vladimir, swear not to further discuss Y2K on the DML till January 2, 2000
> !!
>
> Ok you win...
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Patrick and
> Kelly Engram
> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 11:10 AM
> To: DML
> Subject: DML: Quit the Y2K
>
>
> Hey, I'm all for sharing info and all, and realize that here and there
> we may want to quickly
> discuss non-Dak-related topics with a quick "Dak-content...." added on
> as humor, but this
> Y2K bug topic is really getting drawn out and old. I want to talk about
> trucks and performance,
> not computers. I can go log on some chat room somewhere else and get
> all the discussion I
> can handle there. 8 ^ )
> Am I the only one that feels this way?
> Patrick
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:37:55 -0600
> From: Vladimir Ryall <vladimir@austin.rr.com>
> Subject: RE: DML: darn hypertech
>
> I hate the fact that the new programmer won't work with the Mopar HP
> Computer, only with the factory one, what gives...
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> Dester243@aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 5:07 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: darn hypertech
>
>
> 93-99 dakota 5.2 and 5.9 programmer is out from hypertech. also works with
> the rams, jeeps.. just goto hypertech's webpage and it's posted there.
> - -Dseter
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:36:47 -0500
> From: fawcett@uism.bu.edu
> Subject: Re: DML: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
>
> AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dude this is my
> worst nightmare!!!! I can't think of anything bad enough to do to the
> bastard that screwed up your rig!... But I could try ;)
>
> It's crap like this that makes guys lose their hair... Where's my rogane
> at?!
>
> Best wishes for a speedy and inexpensive (yeah right, huh! :( repair.
>
> T.
> _____________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: DML: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
> Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net> at smtpout
> Date: 1/11/99 9:04 PM
>
>
> Okay, i'm totally pissed. i've pampered my baby for SOO long, no visible
> scratches. NOTHING. and now. as i walked to my car, it hits me. some stupid
> idiot side swiped me. puts a stripe that tore my hear from the rear taillight
> (with ram head graphic) all the way past the rear wheel and pushes the little
> hump inward so it looks like a piece of crap. it really pisses me off. to
> have someone love and pamper something SOO well and to find it all screwed up
> by an idiot why can't drive. but that's my thoughts, if you see any one in
> kansas, that has fresh black paint on their car or something, get their plates
> and i swear to god their pos will suffer.............
> - -Dester
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:44:53 -0500
> From: fawcett@uism.bu.edu
> Subject: Re[2]: DML: My poor dakota gets friggin hit
>
> <<Sorry about your truck. Did you asy Kansas? You might wana check
> Dorothy's bike. I couldn't resist! Hope you find the Ba%^$#t Bob>>
>
> DOH!!! It took me awhile, but I finally got this one :-)... Toto, no?! Ooh,
> Eee, Ooh... Heeheehee.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:57:28 -0500 (EST)
> From: William Blount Arthur <m990198@nadn.navy.mil>
> Subject: Re: DML: 2 inch drop in rear
>
> yeh, I will check that, I dont think it effected it that much. Anyways, I
> have one on a friends web page, I will see if I can find the address. If
> you guys really want, I will try and scan something and send it with the
> drop so you can see if you like it. I think it looks good. I was worried
> it would look too low in the back, but it looks ok. Also, the new
> shackles look like they are put together way better. The old ones looked
> kinda crappy if you ask me. (spotty welding)
>
> Bill
> '97 SS/T
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Michael Styer wrote:
>
>> We love those fuzzy dice :) Seriously, you might want to check your
>> headlights and see that they're still aimed where they're supposed to be.
Do
>> you have any pictures posted?
>>
>> Mike S.
>>
>> William Blount Arthur wrote:
>>
>> > Well everybody who asked...
>> >
>> > I put the 2 inch shackle drop on the truck today. I ordered it from Jegs.
>> > Wouldnt you know it, the price changed after I ordered it so it was 5
>> > bucks cheaper than expected. Cool. Anyways, I put it on in about an
>> > hour, if that, with a little help from my friends. It looks pretty good
>> > actually, it took some getting used to seeing the bumper that low, but it
>> > actually looks level. It hangles like it is balanced better which is good
>> > and it also hooks up good now. I kicked it at a light and it rocks way
>> > back now, good static weight transfer, and it should have better 60 ft
>> > times from this I hope. Well, I am not through with this truck yet. I am
>> > about to go all out and put the Dixie Air horns from JC Whitney on it. It
>> > all started with those stupid fuzzy dice. Oh well.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> > '97 SS/T
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:09:21 -0500 (EST)
> From: William Blount Arthur <m990198@nadn.navy.mil>
> Subject: RE: DML: darn hypertech
>
> Ok, where is this, I looked on the hypertech page and couldnt find
> anything about 96-98s?
>
> Bill
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Vladimir Ryall wrote:
>
>> I hate the fact that the new programmer won't work with the Mopar HP
>> Computer, only with the factory one, what gives...
>>
>> VLADIMIR
>> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
>> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>> http://www.indyram.org/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> Dester243@aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 5:07 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: Re: DML: darn hypertech
>>
>>
>> 93-99 dakota 5.2 and 5.9 programmer is out from hypertech. also works with
>> the rams, jeeps.. just goto hypertech's webpage and it's posted there.
>> -Dseter
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:21:09 -0500 (EST)
> From: Robert Lange <DOYLEVONHEMI@webtv.net>
> Subject: DML: DML chryslers at carlisle
>
> I think a east coast meeting of the DML at carlisle is a damn good
> idea.Lets try to set it up.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:27:20 -0800
> From: "Holloway,Frank T" <Frank.T.Holloway@KP.ORG>
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
>
> You have got my "HELLLLL YEAH"
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vladimir Ryall [SMTP:vladimir@austin.rr.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 11, 1999 7:30 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
>>
>> I can understand completely, I wish you the best of luck. This whole
>> thing
>> is Microsoft's fault anyway, right... CAN I GET A "HELL YEAH" !!!!!!!!!
>>
>> VLADIMIR
>> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
>> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>> http://www.indyram.org/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> Holloway,Frank T
>> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 1999 7:24 PM
>> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
>> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preparation Attn Vladimir
>>
>>
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> I wish I could say the same, we are now in the process of Y2K
>> certification.
>> Some of our mainframes need to be replaced (not Y2K compliant). Some of
>> our
>> in-house software is 20 years old and still needs to be checked out. We
>> also
>> have some of our platforms that still need an OS upgrade. Still a lot of
>> work to do and I am nervous....
>>
>> Frank
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Vladimir Ryall [SMTP:vladimir@austin.rr.com]
>> > Sent: Saturday, January 09, 1999 2:01 PM
>> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> > Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: Y2K preperation
>> >
>> > Frank,
>> >
>> > I too support numerous OS adn hardware platforms. Most of these have
>> been
>> > Y2K for some time now. I am sure there will be some isolated incidents,
>> > but, everall, I think we will all wake up very safe and sound. If there
>> > are
>> > those companies that have waited till now to address it then, maybe they
>> > should not be there in 2000... I wish everyone would relax, but not
>> fall
>> > asleep about this.
>> >
>> > VLADIMIR
>> > 96 Indy "FASRAM"
>> > http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>> > http://www.indyram.org/
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> > Holloway,Frank T
>> > Sent: Friday, January 08, 1999 9:21 AM
>> > To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
>> > Subject: DML: RE: RE: Y2K preperation
>> >
>> >
>> > Vladimir,
>> > It really is a serious problem and I am worried about it. The company I
>> > work
>> > for has contracted out the software testing and contracted cost is 8
>> > million
>> > dollars for verification of the software we have source code for. This
>> > problem will even effect things like elevators and environmental
>> controls
>> > in
>> > buildings. When our networks and software comes crashing down, I am the
>> > one
>> > that MUST get it back up. I can see many many sleepless nights to get
>> > through this one....
>> >
>> > Frank
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Vladimir Ryall [SMTP:vladimir@austin.rr.com]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 1999 11:48 PM
>> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> > > Subject: DML: RE: Y2K preperation
>> > >
>> > > You have got to be kidding. Is everyone on edge about this or what.
>> I
>> > > suppose there will be a few issues, but, get us a break. I am just
>> > > curious
>> > > how many folks are in a tizzy about this thing. You probably watch
>> too
>> > > much
>> > > network TV is my guess. Is there really this much of a feeling of
>> > > insecurity out there? I am real curious now...
>> > >
>> > > VLADIMIR
>> > > 96 Indy "FASRAM"
>> > > http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>> > > http://www.indyram.org/
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> > > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> > > mike.burgess@akamail.com
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 1999 2:08 PM
>> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> > > Subject: DML: Y2K preperation
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > FWIW, heres a couple of opinion laden links about Y2K problems
>> > >
>> > > Martial Law:
>> > >
>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/19990107_xcbtl_the_ugly_s.shtml
>> > > Gvmt Expert on Electrical Power & Distribution (Rick Cowles):
>> > > http://www.cbn.org/y2k/cowles.htm
>> > > Test programs for PC's:
>> > > http://www.euy2k.com/resource.htm
>> > >
>> > > More predictions:
>> > > http://www.ruprecht.com/
>> > >
>> > > Have fun! Getting my generator picked out, and fuel for 2 months @ 2
>> > hrs
>> > > a day, to keep the fridge cool.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > --
>> > > ----
>> > > (__) ,---------. NOTE: The preceding message was sent via
>> > Jaek
>> > > and
>> > > (oo) | :\/: _ _ \ Jon's WWW mail cow gateway. That is to
>> say,
>> > > the
>> > > /-------\/_/ : :: :: : ) person who sent this message could in
>> fact
>> > be
>> > > an
>> > > / | MAIL|| \_ ' '`-'`-'/ anonymous prankster. Even though this
>> > message
>> > > was
>> > > * ||"" || \__________/ mailed to you from the cs.fredonia.edu
>> > domain,
>> > > it
>> > > ^^ ^^ could have been generated by anyone in the
>> > > world.
>> > > Please keep this in mind. Thank you! --Jaek (smit2204) and -Jon-
>> > > (stei0302)
>> > >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > --
>> > > ----
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of DML Digest V4 #152
> *************************
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:56 EDT