I took a look at this page for a while. Well, the pecimist I am I have
to point out the bad things. The Ranger scored better overall. Took a
look at the chevy S-10 and the GMC S-15 (supposed to be the same exact
truck, right?) almost completely different results. The need to be a
little more specific on the vehicles or it does no good to have this
info. One could have been a loaded ext. cab V6 4x4, and the other a base
model 4-banger w/ a reg. cab. Kinda hard to compare things when you
don't know what you are comparing. Thanks for the info though, I love to
have things to back up my theory: Don't believe statistics or tests of
any kind, even if they favor you. You can make results say whatever you
want them to say.
Erich
P.S. Whats w/ the advertising of the companies at the bottom of the
pages? That makes me believe it even less!
Bob wrote:
>
> I just saw this on the Dodge truck list and thought it would be of interest.
> Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael or Diane "Armin" Dominguez <michael.dominguez2@gte.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.autos.dodge.trucks
> Date: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 4:15 PM
> Subject: Dodge Dakota Crash test results
>
> >This link is for all the whiner's out there that say the Dakota is an
> unsafe
> >truck. Read People, Read!
> >http://www.crashtest.com/dodge.htm
> >
> >--
> >Michael A. Dominguez
> >10224 Connemara Ave. Sw
> >Albuquerque, NM, 87121
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:09 EDT