Re: Fastest '98-'99?

From: Glen Renzoni (glenzoni@totacc.com)
Date: Sun Jan 31 1999 - 03:49:51 EST


Wouldn't this have to compensate for altitude somehow? I don't think
someone in Denver will run close to someone at sea level. I know there's a
formula to correct the times to sea level, but I don't know what it is.
Anybody out there know what it is? Just my opinion.

----------
> From: Alan Short <ashort@flash.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Fastest '98-'99?
> Date: Saturday, January 30, 1999 1:32 PM
>
> > Naturally aspirated vs. not.
> > Don't forget daily drivers vs. pure race truck.
> Robert, I was thinking these sub catagories were covered by the more
> general catagories of "stock"-"modified"."stock" being your daily driver
> with maybe a few simple performance bolt-ons. "modified" is something
> more extreme, anything with a major HP upgrade reguardless of cost and
> ease of installation. Both catagories exclude full race trailer queens,
> remember we're talking about '98-'99's here. Last, no one HAS to
> participate in the survey, I would be curious to know, myself. WHO is
> the fastest stock/modified '98-'99 Dakota? and Can you prove it? Alan S.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:21 EDT