WM96@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/31/99 7:09:39 PM, ashort@flash.net writes:
>
> << '98-'99's? we know about the fast older Daks, what about the new ones! >>
>
> Shouldn't '97's be included in this too? That's the year they switched
> styles...
>
> Will
OK. Alan S.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:31 EDT