Re: Mopar Computers

From: Robert Trottmann (rotrottmann@davidson.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 03 1999 - 11:17:29 EST


The reason I mentioned long distances was b/c of having to run 93 octane,
thats all. I've put thousands of miles on my MP SBEC, and drive from St.Louis
to North carolina with it all the time. It would be nice to be able to switch
out, and save .20$ per gallon. (I can't, 'cause the stock comp. pings anyway,
but other's might.) You can easily make that $100 back with a few good long
trips on the stock computer.....lets see..at 17mpg you'd have to drive 8500
miles with the stock comp switched in to save $100.....well, lots of big
trips.
Later (if this post seems incoherent, please note the fact that it was sent
before noon...not my 'prime time')

Mark Kuzia wrote:

> That is not true! I drove my 94 over 150 miles a day, three times a week
> with the MP-SBEC! I even drove it to Utah from Michigan when the truck had
> 125,000 miles on it. I got fuel milage of between 17.5 and 19.5 mpg. I had
> the mopar computer in it since 37,000.
>
> Mark
> http://home.att.net/~flyboy01
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoffrey Hackbart <ghack2@hotmail.com>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 1:08 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: Mopar Computers
>
> >So, it is not good to drive long distances with the MPSBEC? Like how
> >far? I drive alot during the day. It hasn't been a year yet and I
> >already have @22K mis on my truck. End of the mo. is a year.
> >
> >Later,
> >Geoffrey
> >~~98 DAK CC SLT 3.9L Metallic Red~~



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:31 EDT