Actually, most automatics can handle more power than most slush boxes...
Vladimir "FASRAM"
http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
http://www.indyram.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net] On Behalf Of Bernd D.
Ratsch
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 1999 10:01 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: Re: 5 Speed vs. Automatic -Reply -Reply -Reply
Or maybe the AUTO couldn't handle the power....Bahahahaha....
<snicker...giggle...tease tease...> :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> WillTier@aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 1999 8:27 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: 5 Speed vs. Automatic -Reply -Reply -Reply
>
>
> In a message dated 2/26/99 12:20:31 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu writes:
>
> << Agreed... Now, I'd like to think that my truck's application is less
> towards a Ram, and more towards ohhh... a Viper. Which, as we all
> know, has no auto. :-) (Heh heh heh! Automotive name-dropping? Why
> the heck not???) ;-)
> >>
>
> Yeh on the same line of thinking you have the garbage trcuks I
> think they're
> mostly stick and 18 wheelers I think are mostly stick, yeh there
> are probably
> a lot more pokey rigs out there with sticks too ? Now those big powerful
> things like bulldozers and graders are mostly autos . The Viper
> is kind of the
> exception to the rule as it has power but usually doesn't perform
> real well
> with all those missed shifts :-)
>
> GW
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:46 EDT