Re: Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L

From: SuperNagz@aol.com
Date: Mon May 03 1999 - 20:24:28 EDT

Next message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Fw: 1997 Dodge Dakota Reprogramming"
Previous message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: solution to popping bed noise"
Maybe in reply to: John van Gemert: "Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

yes... but.. keep in mind that the identical Jeep Grand Cherokee with the
5.9L (last year) was... what? 0.3 seconds slower? (In the newest issue of
Motor Trend)

Next message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Fw: 1997 Dodge Dakota Reprogramming"
Previous message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: solution to popping bed noise"
Maybe in reply to: John van Gemert: "Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: Re: 4.7L VS. 5.2L"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:57 EDT