more proof that NATO bombing is good

From: HEMI@charter.net
Date: Fri May 14 1999 - 11:19:55 EDT

Next message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Previous message: Densteadt, James: "RE: Flame war with the Ranger guys , anyone ?"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Maybe reply: Jon Smith: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Reply: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Pulled this from the AutoX mailing list :

To: autox@autox.team.net
From: "Karl A. Rickert" <alfakarl@mail.tds.net>
Subject: NATO update
Sender: owner-autox@autox.team.net
Reply-To: "Karl A. Rickert" <alfakarl@mail.tds.net>

A NATO airstrike totally destroyed the Belgrade Yugo factory. Damage was
estimated at nearly four dollars.

Karl A. Rickert
C Stock Alfa Spider #38
Dixie Region SCCA
TLS #25

Next message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Previous message: Densteadt, James: "RE: Flame war with the Ranger guys , anyone ?"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Maybe reply: Jon Smith: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Reply: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: more proof that NATO bombing is good"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:03 EDT