Re: 4.7L Vs. 5.2L

Next message: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Gas Mileage"
Previous message: NVMYDakota@aol.com: "Re: Tonneau Covers?"
Maybe in reply to: P. Phelps: "4.7L Vs. 5.2L"
Next in thread: NVMYDakota@aol.com: "Re: 4.7L Vs. 5.2L"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: <A HREF="mailto:dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net?Subject=Re:%204.7L%20Vs.%205.2L&In-Reply-To=&lt;1fa4f3a7.24747945@aol.com&gt;">[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: Mst29@aol.com
Date: Wed May 19 1999 - 16:29:57 EDT

I think the 4.7 is a better engine, but parts will take a little while to get
made for it.
Expect exhaust to be out first.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:07 EDT