Uhoh...here we go again....
:O
----- Original Message -----
From: Aaron <acolona@i-55.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 1999 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Gas Mileage
> yeah well............mine runs better without a tun-up than yours does
with
> one. Just picking.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 1999 5:18 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Gas Mileage
>
>
> > I'm staying outta this one....
> >
> > (But my tune-ups are cheaper!!) ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > At 04:09 PM 05/20/1999 -0500, you wrote:
> > >me and a friend bought our daks at about the same time. I got an 8 and
> he's
> > >got the six and our mileage is almost identical. I just see no point in
> the
> > >six unless your looking to save money.
> > >
> > >Aaron C.
> > >
> > >Okay, bring on the slamming from the v6 guys......I know it's coming.
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Mike Crumley <mcrumley@airmail.net>
> > >To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > >Sent: Thursday, May 20, 1999 12:35 PM
> > >Subject: Re: DML: Gas Mileage
> > >
> > >
> > >> At 04:57 PM 5/19/99 , you wrote:
> > >> >Maybe v6's get crappy millage because you have to puish them so much
> to
> > >get
> > >> >them to preforme like 8s?...
> > >>
> > >> V6s--crappy mileage??? Define crappy mileage. Can't speak for anyone
> else
> > >> but I don't want my V6 to perform (much less preforme) like an 8. If
I
> had
> > >> wanted an 8 I would have gotten an 8.
> > >>
> > >> Good mileage Mike
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:08 EDT