Since I have a body lift on my truck already (2"...not 3"), the only
problem I saw was with the exhaust hangers and the O2 Sensor
wires...otherwise, it didn't make a difference...IMO.
As for the 3" Body Lift, you need to do some cutting around the shifter as
well as some linkage modifications (if you have the automatic). The 2"
doesn't require this.
At 08:26 AM 06/10/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>That brings up another question, from a comment I saw a little while back on
>the list. Is it true that if you do a body lift (3") that you cannot use the
>Headers (Leach)?
>
>Those are two mods. I have planned, but if they are incompatible, I'll
>obviously have to decide which I want more...
>
>TIA
>
>Duff
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dakota_5sp_v8 [mailto:dakota_5sp_v8@zracer.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 12:06 AM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: DML: Re: 5.2L-vs-5.9L Headers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> people on this list including mysef have found the JBA shorty
>> headers bolt
>> up and look nice but hit the frame and thats no good
>> expecailly if you go 4
>> wheeling. I like the Mike leach setup, they are full leangth
>> and include a
>> bigger Y which is where most of the power can be had.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>>
>>
>> > Greetings all!
>> >
>> > The R/T list was unable to give an answer, so we will ask
>> the experts!
>> >
>> > "What differences have you found between 5.2-vs-5.9L
>> headers for the 97-99
>> > year models?"
>> >
>> > Has anyone even looked?
>> >
>> > Gene & Renee
>> > 99 R/T
>> > 95 SLT
>>
Bernd D. Ratsch
Pflugerville, TX
http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Dakota.htm
1997 Dodge Dakota SLT/CC (V6)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:23 EDT