Bernd,
Both approaches have their respective good points, but as with any build-up,
goals should be set and components should be selected to meet the goals. You
wouldn't go out and purchase a cam based solely on lift numbers would
you??????
Frank
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [SMTP:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 7:23 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: R+D TB vs QUIK-D TB?
>
>
> Granted I already have their competitions....but from the stats below, i'd
> take the Quick-D.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of John Mautz
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 9:19 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: R+D TB vs QUIK-D TB?
>
>
> Personally I like the Quick-D TB. Here are the differences as I see them
> from the info and pics on their respective sites:
>
> Quick D R&D
> --------------------------- ------------------------
> Bore: 51.57 Bore: 50.00
> SS Shaft w/ button heads SS Shaft w/ button heads
> Brass Butterflies SS Throttle place
> Button TB Bolts Re-use stock hex bolts
> Air horns removed & smoothed Risers remain though thinner
> Long S-Bolt for TB hat None mentioned
> $275 + $200 core $299.95 + $175 core
> Turn around time 2 weeks "no long wait periods"
> Shipping included Shipping not mentioned
>
> That's how I see read the two sites. They both use different terms to say
> what I believe to be the same thing, but I could be wrong.
>
> Hope this helps.
> John
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> >Mst29@aol.com
> >Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 3:43 PM
> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >Subject: DML: R+D TB vs QUIK-D TB?
> >
> >
> > I would appreciate any and all feedback on this matter.
> >Which do you think is better? Any of you that have these TB'S,how do they
> >perform?
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:27 EDT