I had a 94 Dakota with the V-6 in it. I put a 2.5 pipe on it with a
flowmaster, and free flow cat. 1) it REALLY sounded like shit, kinda like
those rice burners (pissed of bee). 2) tre truck ran great at first, then it
really ran like shit. There wasn't enough back pressure. Maybe I did
something wrong. I'm by no means an exhaust expert. But thought I would give
you warning. If it works for you, let me know. I would love to put an
exhaust on my new dakota.
>From: "Ashton, Rick" <RGASHTON@nettally.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Exhaust size for a V6
>Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 14:25:31 -0400
>
>can you use 2 2.5" pipes or is that too much for a V6 as well?
>
>The Man From Utopia wrote:
>
> > 3" is way too much for a 6er... I used 2.5" on mine...
> >
> > Greg
> > 95 DSCC v6 5spd
> >
> > >
> > > Lots of you Dakrs talk about putting in 3" pipes for your rigs for
> > > performance....is that size pipe TOO much for the V6 3.9L? I
> > > understand that
> > > too much of an opening can be just as bad as too much restriction.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin ~Stinger~ Hoegen
> > > '99 Dak Sport CC V6 Solar Yellow
> > > E-mail: hoegen@kersur.net <mailto:hoegen@kersur.net>
> > > Future Dak Site: www.kersur.net/~hoegen
><http://www.kersur.net/~hoegen>
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:56 EDT