Sounds about right. (Both at that...HP Improvement and Flow rate.)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Kevin
Hoegen
Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 11:48 PM
To: DML post
Subject: DML: Air Flow Comparison 10"round vs 6" cone
I called K&N tech help today and asked if they could tell me which filter
would provide more air flow: a 10"x2" open element or a 6"x3" cone. I ask=
ed
this so I might make a final decision as to wether I will put an FABM set=
up
on my intake or a Quik-D style...I may even just connect a 6" cone filter
directly on my stock intake cover.
Anyway, I dont wish to rehash the cold vs volume debate, as I have read o=
n
K&N's site that a reputable automag did a test and determined that the co=
ld
air setup provided an average of 1% increase in HP.
The tech told me that the 6" cone provided almost DOUBLE the flow capacit=
y
of the 10"! Does this sound accurate?
=A0
Kevin ~Stinger~ Hoegen
'99 Dak Sport CC V6 Solar Yellow
E-mail:=A0 hoegen@kersur.net <mailto:hoegen@kersur.net>
Future Dak Site: www.kersur.net/~hoegen <http://www.kersur.net/~hoegen>
=A0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:56 EDT