Also the "look-up tables" run the engine super rich. Intake/exhaust mods
would help use up some of that extra fuel. Mopar computer may lean out WOT
for more performance(not sure tho).
Dr. Pat
----------
>From: RAS002@worldnet.att.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Re: R/T faster under 3/4 throttle than WOT???
>Date: Mon, Jul 19, 1999, 1:17 AM
>
> On Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:16:21 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>
>>Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:52:22 EDT
>>From: SuperNagz@aol.com
>>Subject: Re: DML: RE: R/T faster under 3/4 throttle than WOT???
>>
>>Would that kinda affect me across the entire rpm range though?
>>
>>I just find it odd that my truck has less power at WOT than at less than
>>that...
>>
>>If my truck just needed to be broken in.. you would think I would just have
>>less power at any throttle position, but still obviously WOT should be the
>>best
>
> Hello DAKsters,
>
> It's because anything less than full throttle, your engine is being
> controlled by the PCM's inputs (sensors talk to PCM, PCM tells fuel,
> spark, etc what to do - as good as it gets), while at full throttle
> (fuel, spark, etc) is mapped from pre-built tables. This may result in
> less than optimum performance for your particular vehicle, as the tables
> are the same for all genre of that vehicle (not optimized per individual
> vehicle).
>
> Later,
>
> Russ Selkirk
>
> --
> '96 Black Impala SS
> '85 Silver Monte SS
> '98 Amethyst Dakota RC R/T
> - Port Neches,Texas
> =================================
> NOTE: Anti-Spam Address! Please
> reply to: RAS002@worldnet.att.net
> =================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:02 EDT