Hey, I didn't start it!! Somebody asked for an opinion comparing the
TBs, and the only one I had any idea about was appearance. Anyway, I
felt, and feel, that this thread had gone about as far as it could and
be at all useful! All the TBs have their points, I just like the way
Tony's looks, and with the mods to my truck, and planned ones, his
bigger bore mades sense to me.
Skip
Ryan Krokosinski wrote:
>
> Hey, no fair!! You started it.
> No switching sides!!
>
> Ryan K
> '99 R/T RC
>
> Skip wrote:
> >
> > Me, too!
> >
> > Corey A Meyer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Ryan Krokosinski wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This is a retarded argument. Both TB's are of extremely high
> > > > quality. Size is the deciding factor. If you want 52mm, Quick-D
> > > > is your man... If you want 50mm, go R&D. Problem solved. Let's
> > > > stop hacking on products we haven't even seen.
> > > >
> > > > Ryan K
> > > > '99 R/T RC
> > > >
> > >
> > > I agree completely.
> >
> > --
> > Shadowcatcher Imagery
> > http://members.tripod.com/~shadowcatcherimagery/index.htm
-- Shadowcatcher Imagery http://members.tripod.com/~shadowcatcherimagery/index.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:44 EDT