RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Tue Aug 10 1999 - 22:20:51 EDT


Yup...swapped to 3.90's and it made a BIG difference. Mileage didn't go
down more than .25 but then again, i'm a little bit of a lead foot. Top
speed will suffer slightly but can be made up for with larger tires. (If
that's the look you want.) If you're just going for pure acceleration, the
3.90's are the way to go.

Ted...how did your truck run after the 3.55 - 3.90 swap?

Bernd D. Ratsch
Pflugerville, TX
1997 Dodge Dakota SLT/CC - 2WD
http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Dakota.htm
bernd@texas.net

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
kwjohn@ais.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 8:43 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90

HI all,

Anyone who's made this change to a '97+ w/V6, can you give any
indication of changes in cruising RPM? How about mileage? Top speed?

I'm looking for better acceleration (without load) and pulling power
(with horse trailer), and I know this is what's needed. Just trying to
understand what to expect. Anyone have a dyno or dragstrip time to show
a difference?

Thanks
Kurt



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:44 EDT