Re: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Thu Aug 12 1999 - 12:44:07 EDT


I'm in agreement with ya Bob. It's a thread that's been going on and on
and on for at least a year. Look at it this way, we both may be right or
wrong...either way, let's let it go. (For now) ;)

- Bernd

At 12:28 PM 08/12/1999 +0000, you wrote:
>At 10:52 AM 8/12/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >Oh man...now we're getting into it. ;)
>
>At 08:55 AM 8/12/99 -0700, another DMLer wrote:
> >HEY BOB, WHAT ARE YOU THINK'N, IT A NO BRAINER?? THE BIGGER THE TIRE THE
> >BIGGER THE DIAMETER, THUS THE MORE TIMES THE DRIVE SHAFT WILL TURN FOR EVERY
> >REVOLUTION OF THE TIRE.
>
>I think that it's about time to take this discussion off the list.
>I'd be glad to continue privately if either of you wish. I do consider
>both of your views very carefully but, right now, I (and one other ... not
>a DMLer ) still disagree with some of your statements.
>
>Bob
>Burlington, Ontario
>
>'97 CC Sport, 5.2L, 3.55, auto., 4x2, flame red



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:45 EDT