Re: Another Ram-Air hood question

From: Terri Pryer (dzoo@arn.net)
Date: Sun Aug 29 1999 - 01:18:22 EDT


no no maybe I was misunderstood. I meant a Gen 2 dakota. Sorry for not
clarifying.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Tom <tigers@bserv.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Saturday, August 28, 1999 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Another Ram-Air hood question

>At 10:58 PM 8/27/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>Still would rather have a shaker just for pure looks.
>>Any estimate of when if at all one will be developed
>>for a gen 2? [snip]
>
>The shaker is the 'enclosed' air cleaner which sits so high on top
>of the tb so that a cutout has to made in the hood. The openings
>in the air cleaner, above the hood, have the same function as
>the scoops in a ram-air hood. The gen 2 is a completely different
>design in which outside air is from the fender area and there
>is no true ram-air effect.
>
>The shaker, being attached to the tb and sticking through the hood,
>vibrates with the engine when it is running. This is what caused
>the 'wow' reaction on the muscle car mopars that offered the shaker
>option.
>
>Bob
>Burlington, Ontario
>
>'97 CC Sport, 5.2L, 3.55, auto., 4x2, flame red
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:08 EDT