R/Ts are Dakotas too.

From: Patrick and Kelly Engram (shetland@erols.com)
Date: Thu Sep 02 1999 - 21:30:33 EDT

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re: Non dak but hilarious"
Previous message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re: Non dak but hilarious"
Next in thread: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: Dester223@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: Terri Pryer: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: Peter L Anthony: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> but does anyone know for sure if the R/T's are going to be continued
with
this model.

This is the Dakota list, R/T people have thier own list, good luck

Aw, Ted, that wasn't nice!
Patrick

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re: Non dak but hilarious"
Previous message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re: Non dak but hilarious"
Next in thread: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: Dester223@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: Terri Pryer: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: Peter L Anthony: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Maybe reply: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: R/Ts are Dakotas too."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:31 EDT