Three years on a DYNO...but the Jet-II for the Dakota has only been out for
a little under 2 years...and not as advertised as GM. Makes one think which
JET he/she was referring to: GM, FORD, Chrysler, etc.
Personally, if they would make one, i'd drop my JET-II for an MP computer
anyday. But, since it's the only alternative right now...well...you know
how that goes. :)
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of GS-
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 10:21 AM
To: DML
Subject: DML: Re: Jet or Hypertech
Good questions to ask but, it appears only a few have
good Jet chips.
Its pretty obvious that there are many bad Jet II chips
out there and why the hell not draw a conclusion? 3 years
on a dyno, you think he would know a bad product when he
sees it. I heard enough of THIS one to want to wait on the
MP computer or possibly the Hypertech, but I'm going to
wait to see some positive and Negative feedback.
GS -
98 5.2L 5spd
>
> After he had removed the Jet-II, did he reset the computer as well? This
> person DID have the 180 T'Stat installed...right? What did the power
curves
> look like with and without the Jet-II? Did he send the results into Jet
for
> an explanation? Can you have this person scan his Dyno sheets and post
them
> somewhere?
>
> It just seems strange when the driving characteristics of the vehicle with
> (and without) the Jet are very noticeable. (Better with the Jet...in most
> cases.) Most of the people that i've spoken with (mostly V6's) have had
> great results with it installed.
>
> $0.02
>
> - Bernd
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Jet or Hypertech
>
> I'll tell you what happened during the dyno day a couple of weeks ago.
> I won't draw any conclusions, just relate the event. A guy put his V6
> Dakota up on the dyno, the only mods he had I know of was an MSD 6A
> ignition and Jet II. He did the run. The graph showed a whole bunch
> of funny spikes, and the hp results left a lot to be desired. I don't
> remember the numbers, but the owner was disappointed, and I remember
> the tech who was running the dyno saying the numbers didn't look good.
> When the tech asked what mods the guy had and the owner replied, the
> tech reacted to the Jet II rather negatively, and told the guy to take
> it off. He did, and the next dyno run showed a smoother curve and a
> slight increase in horsepower. The tech said the Jet II's are junk
> and he's never seen his dyno show an improvement with one in the three
> years he's had it. I have no opinion on this, just relating what
> happened.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:56 EDT