RE: Re: RE: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long )

From: Barret, Matt (MATT_BARRET@EARTHTECH.COM)
Date: Fri Oct 29 1999 - 12:55:23 EDT


Thanks Greg, for back'n me on this one!!
Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: NVMYDakota@aol.com [mailto:NVMYDakota@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 12:40 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda
Long)

In a message dated 10/29/99 8:25:18 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
nosdakota@email.msn.com writes:

<< Once again the 4.7L rules!!! Thanks Bernd!! >>

Yeah,I am glad Dodge finally came out the ol pushrod closet. This jsut
proves what people have been saying all along. Just emagine if they made a
DOHC V10. hehehe it would easliy beat a Lamborgini (if in a Viper). I
love my 318 and all, but if it ever dies, I think I'll try to get a newer
technology Overheadcam engine, they jsut work better.
    Case and point, 95 Bonniville has 205HP at engine, throw on their
supercharger, it makes as much as a 360, 245HP, you can't beat that, and it
get's 25-30MPG, I hate to admit it, but Technology is winning, not size.

(I do hate seeing R/T's doing so shitty though, wonder were the thrill
went?)
                                    Greg



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:18:33 EDT