Re: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)

From: Jon Smith (fast4x4@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Oct 31 1999 - 01:30:57 EDT


the R/T is rated at a 7.5 0-60? surely that aint right!?!?!? I thought
ther terd lightflash was rated at 5.5??
____________________________________________
Jon Smith-Raleigh,NC-http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jdsmith4
'95 318 auto CC 4x4: Accel Supercoil, JBA headers,
dual glasspack, 14x3 FABM, F&B Stage I TB, !EGR,
MSD 8.5's, self-moded intake, 180 degree thermo,
ASP crank pulley, 16" Hayden elec. fan, MP SBEC,
BEST: 0-60 in 6.3 & 1/4mi 15.4@88.95
207.2 RWHP, 276.2 RW ft/lbs
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
----- Original Message -----
From: <SS454454@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 1999 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)

> LOl i read the article. Nothing like putting a 360 hp truck Supercharged
> none the less Up against a 250 Hp truck. Yeah thats even. NOT. Hell for
the
> price difference of 10 000 $ you can get a RT supercharge it NOS
headers
> exhaust and exhaust and still have $ left over. And at that point youll
be
> way faster. The difference is what 6.5 vs.7,5 in the o to 60 Yeah a
second
> is way too much to shave off the dakota NOT. Dont get me wrong i like what
> Ford did with the Lightning but i dont like biased write ups. so because
its
> a second slower than the lightning than the dakota isnt worthy. Thats a
load
> of u know what.
> Rob
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:18:37 EDT