Look I'm not saying the vette is a bad car. I just asked someone which
engine they had because I was not aware of a vette that could pull low 12's
STOCK. I didn't say the viper was better or worse I just said it's faster
(and it is, there is several numbers to back that up). The fact that noone
has answered the origional question,"which motor" leads me to believe that a
vette can't do it. the fact that I have beaten vettes with my truck at the
track leads me to believe the same thing(two of the guy's knew how to drive
the car and one did not), isa it more refined? it better be they've been
working on it for 30+ years. is it cheaper? Yes.
Joe W.
87 Shelby Charger 13.9
98 Dakota 13.1
----- Original Message -----
From: <SS454454@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Damn Texans! Vette vs. Viper
> Yeah that 1 sec difference is there if you know how to shift and get a
good start. Dude believe me a bad driver wont get what dodge claims as thre
performance times no matter how well set up the car is. Like give a driver
a dodge viper and tell him to click off 12 sec qt mile times most will be
in the 13 easy and that will be because the thing is so torquey. Il take a
corvette and go 175 with the ac and stereo on and have a smooth drive
> vipers are nice but for the price i wouldnt even rent one
> Ron
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:03 EDT