RE: Re: RE: Damn Texans! Vette vs. Viper

From: Densteadt, James (james.densteadt@eds.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 1999 - 09:42:40 EST


SNIP from below....."But I'd rather have a Viper, because that's the kind of
girl I am :)"

Can I hear an amen!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: fdedip@whale-mail.com [mailto:fdedip@whale-mail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 12:08 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: Re: DML: RE: Damn Texans! Vette vs. Viper

And first off let me say how pleased I am that I managed to start a thread
called "Damn Texans!", and have it last this long :)
It isn't really fair to compare a Vette to a Viper, they are designed for
totally different purposes. The Viper was designed to be a bad-ass driving
machine. That's it. It wasn't designed for comfort, for spending long
hours on the road, or for refinement. It is a brute of a car, and it isn't
for everyone. It's unfortunate that the people who would get the most
enjoyment of it (like me!), can't afford it. I read Bob Lutz'
autobiography, and he describes the designing of the Viper. He makes it
clear that they decided early on, no compromises! Just performance.
I believe the Vette was originally designed as a performance vehicle also,
but that has long since been compromised in turning it into a comfortable
ride with all the conveniences that people expect of their vehicle. Dennis,
you made that clear yourself when you referred to yours as a "Cadillac" of a
Corvette. This doesn't mean I don't like Vettes. I do like them,
especially the '60s models. I may well own a Vette someday, since a person
can pick up a used Vette
pretty reasonable, and I will probably never be able to afford a Viper.
But I'd rather have a Viper, because that's the kind of girl I am :)
Flip
sorry, didn't mean to write an essay.

http://www.care2.com - The Best of The Internet...With A Green Twist!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:04 EDT