Re: SC, MPG increase

From: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com
Date: Fri Nov 05 1999 - 08:08:06 EST

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: 180 T-stats 97-99's"
Previous message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: RE: is there camber on the rear?"
Maybe in reply to: Dave Scelfo: "SC, MPG increase"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 11/4/99 4:10:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
macncheesemonster@hotmail.com writes:

> When running a SC, isn't it necessary to run premium (92+)? I think this
> offsets any gain in MPG. I dunno. Just pointin out the facts.
>
> --
> Dave
No Dave, I run regular gas...

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: 180 T-stats 97-99's"
Previous message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: RE: is there camber on the rear?"
Maybe in reply to: Dave Scelfo: "SC, MPG increase"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:07 EDT