Im not sure about that?? I would understand the loss
in lowend if you were to run a dual 3" Cat-back
system. Couldn't you make up for the loss, if any, by
modifying the throttle body???? Also, has anyone used
the Random Tech. cat yet? It looks sweet!
www.randomtechnology.com
Mike Sype
--- Alan Short <ashort@flash.net> wrote:
> >
> > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:09:21 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Mike Sype <blue98dakota@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: DML: Re: Catco cat
> >
> > Alan, did you stay with the stock pipe size or did
> you
> > move up to 2-3/4 or 3" with the cat. The reason I
> > wan't to change the cat is for more flow due to
> the
> > increase in inlet/outlet size.
> >
> > Mike Sype
>
> I stayed with the stock size, I just made sure there
> were no machine
> bent pipes at all. Full mandrel bends from front to
> back.
> The headers and downpipes are Mopar and the catback
> is a Gibson single
> out (like stock). The Catco is a bit shorter than
> the stock cat, so I
> had a new pipe put between the cat and the catback.
> All the joints are
> welded, from the downpipes back.
> The word on 3" is it kills your low end, so I would
> stick with the stock
> diameter.
> Alan S.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:18 EDT