Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru...

From: SS454454@aol.com
Date: Fri Nov 26 1999 - 00:14:21 EST

Next message: John Mautz: "RE: Re: Hughes Engines Cam selection - Frank"
Previous message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re: DML Going to the dragstrip"
Next in thread: Kabuki2@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Maybe reply: Kabuki2@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Maybe reply: Kabuki2@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 11/26/1999 4:00:45 AM !!!First Boot!!!,
stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu writes:

<< intercooler >>

its not needed but is helpful if you can afford it
Rob

Next message: John Mautz: "RE: Re: Hughes Engines Cam selection - Frank"
Previous message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re: DML Going to the dragstrip"
Next in thread: Kabuki2@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Maybe reply: Kabuki2@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Maybe reply: Kabuki2@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Turbochargers on Daks. Was: Re: RE:discrimination against low tru..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:35 EDT