Actually, as much as I hate to admit it, it's considerably faster. We've all
seen the numbers to back it up. anyone else here seen a 318 CC auto run mid
15's stock? Me either. But it seems to be the norm for the 4.7
Joe W.
87 Shelby Charger 13.9
98 Dakota 13.1
> From: SS454454@aol.com [mailto:SS454454@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 7:05 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: RE: 4.7L Vs. 5.2L Ohhh Nooo. (Was - My Po'boy
> Pics)
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/99 3:26:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> acolona@i-55.com writes:
>
> << okay, but after the usual bolt-ons, what else can you do to that ohc
> engine? >>
>
> Head work (port and polish ), When they make them different cam, id say
> pretty much anything you have the $ for. Just because its a OHC motor it
> doesnt mean they arent ready to be made better. BTW when your pushrod
motor
>
> starts wheezing at 4000 rpm the OHC design goes past that. Thats the good
> thing anout the OHC they rev better and quicker than the ohc . At least
> thats
> been my experience. Ive owned only pushrod motors, ( except for a QUAD 4
> Oldsmobile) And i have to say the 4.7 is really surprised me. I like it
> very
> much. t feels faster. probably all the extra noise
> Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:39 EDT